Real Options Technique as a Tool of Strategic Risk Management

Volodymyr Savchuk

2023-03-16

Abstract:The real options approach is now considered an effective alternative to the corporate DCF model for a feasibility study. The current paper offers a practical methodology employing binomial trees and real options techniques for evaluating investment projects. A general computation procedure is suggested for the decision tree with two active stages of real options, which correspond to additional investments. The suggested technique can be used for most real options, which are practically essential regarding enterprise strategy. The special case named Binomial-Random-Cash-Flow Real Options Model with random outcomes is developed as the next step of real options modelling. Project Value at Risk is introduced and used as a criterion of investment project feasibility under the assumption regarding random outcomes. In particular, the Gaussian probability distribution is used for modelling option outcomes uncertainty. The choice of the Gaussian distribution is caused by the desire to obtain estimates in the final analytical form. Choosing another distribution for random outcomes leads to using Monte Carlo simulation, for which a general framework is developed by demonstrating some instances. The author could avoid the computational complexity that makes these solutions feasible for business practice.

Risk Management,Statistical Finance

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main issue this paper attempts to address is the limitations of traditional capital budgeting methods (such as the DCF model) in evaluating and managing the uncertainty of investment projects. Specifically, the paper points out:

1. **Limitations of Traditional DCF Methods**:
- **Simplified Assumptions**: The DCF method is based on forecasts of future cash flows, which rely on assumptions about parameters such as prices and sales volumes. These assumptions may significantly deviate from actual conditions.
- **Timing of Decisions**: The DCF method assumes that decisions are made "now" and does not consider the possibility of adapting to changes in the future.
- **Insufficient Risk Assessment**: The DCF method mainly focuses on two or a few possible scenarios, failing to fully account for the uncertainty in cash flow forecasts, thereby underestimating the project's risk.

2. **Introduction of Real Options Method**:
- **Flexibility and Adaptability**: The real options method allows for adjustments based on new information during the project implementation process, increasing management flexibility and adaptability.
- **Strategic Risk Management**: By introducing real options, strategic risks can be better managed and assessed, enhancing the feasibility of the project.
- **Uncertainty Modeling**: The paper proposes a real options model based on a binomial tree and stochastic cash flows, which can more accurately assess the uncertainty and risk of the project.

3. **Specific Objectives**:
- **Develop Practical Methods**: The paper aims to develop a practical method that combines binomial trees and real options techniques to evaluate the feasibility of investment projects.
- **Introduce "Project Value at Risk"**: The paper introduces "Project Value at Risk" as a standard for evaluating the feasibility of investment projects, especially in the context of stochastic cash flows.
- **Simplify Computational Complexity**: By choosing a Gaussian probability distribution, the paper avoids complex calculations, making these methods more feasible in actual business practice.

In summary, by introducing and applying the real options method, this paper aims to overcome the shortcomings of traditional DCF methods in evaluating and managing the uncertainty of investment projects, providing a more flexible and accurate evaluation tool.