Abstract:Density functional theory (DFT) is the most widely used electronic structure method, due to its simplicity and cost effectiveness. The accuracy of a DFT calculation depends not only on the choice of the density functional approximation (DFA) adopted but also on the electron density produced by the DFA. SCAN is a modern functional that satisfies all known constraints for meta-GGA functionals. The density-driven errors, defined as energy errors arising from errors of the self-consistent DFA electron density, can hinder SCAN from achieving chemical accuracy in some systems, including water. Density-corrected DFT (DC-DFT) can alleviate this shortcoming by adopting a more accurate electron density which, in most applications, is the electron density obtained at the Hartree-Fock level of theory due to its relatively low computational cost. In this work, we present extensive calculations aimed at determining the accuracy of the DC-SCAN functional for various aqueous systems. DC-SCAN (SCAN@HF) shows remarkable consistency in reproducing reference data obtained at the coupled cluster level of theory, with minimal loss of accuracy. Density-driven errors in the description of ionic aqueous clusters are thoroughly investigated. By comparison with the orbital-optimized CCD density in the water dimer, we find that the self-consistent SCAN density transfers a spurious fraction of an electron across the hydrogen bond to the hydrogen atom (H*, covalently bound to the donor oxygen atom) from the acceptor (OA) and donor (OD) oxygen atoms, while HF makes a much smaller spurious transfer in the opposite direction, consistent with DC-SCAN (SCAN@HF) reduction of SCAN overbinding due to delocalization error. While LDA seems to be the conventional extreme of density delocalization error, and HF the conventional extreme of (usually much smaller) density localization error, these two densities do not quite yield the conventional range of density-driven error in energy differences. Finally, comparisons of the DC-SCAN results with those obtained with the Fermi-Löwdin orbital self-interaction correction (FLOSIC) method show that DC-SCAN represents a more accurate approach to reducing density-driven errors in SCAN calculations of ionic aqueous clusters. While the HF density is superior to that of SCAN for noncompact water clusters, the opposite is true for the compact water molecule with exactly 10 electrons.

Unconventional Error Cancellation Explains the Success of Hartree-Fock Density Functional Theory for Barrier Heights

Unconventional Error Cancellation Explains the Success of Hartree-Fock Density Functional Theory for Barrier Heights

Understanding density driven errors for reaction barrier heights

A New View on Density Corrected DFT: Can One Get a Better Answer for a Good Reason?

Barrier Heights of Hydrogen-Transfer Reactions with Diffusion Quantum Monte Carlo Method

What Types of Chemical Problems Benefit from Density-Corrected DFT? A Probe Using an Extensive and Chemically Diverse Test Suite

Improving results by improving densities: Density-corrected density functional theory

Corrected Density Functional Theory and the Random Phase Approximation: Improved Accuracy at Little Extra Cost

Delocalization error poisons the density-functional many-body expansion

Multiconfiguration Pair-Density Functional Theory is Free from Delocalization Error

How does HF-DFT achieve chemical accuracy for water clusters?

Systematic Evaluation of Counterpoise Correction in Density Functional Theory

A simple and efficient route towards improved energetics within the framework of density-corrected density functional theory

Reaction barriers at metal surfaces computed using the random phase approximation: Can we beat DFT in the generalized gradient approximation?

How Good Is the Density-Corrected SCAN Functional for Neutral and Ionic Aqueous Systems, and What Is So Right about the Hartree-Fock Density?

An Accurate Barrier for the Hydrogen Exchange Reaction from Valence Bond Theory: is This Theory Coming of Age?

The rise and fall of stretched bond errors: Extending the analysis of Perdew–Zunger self-interaction corrections of reaction barrier heights beyond the LSDA

Computed vs Experimental Energy Barriers in Solution: Influence of the type of the density functional approximation.

Systematic Error Estimation for Chemical Reaction Energies