Abstract:Orbital diamagnetism requires closed orbits according to the Liftshiftz-Kosevich theory. Therefore, one might expect that open Fermi surfaces do not have a diamagnetic response. Contrary to this expectation, we show that open orbits in finite systems do contribute a magnetic response which oscillates between diamagnetism and paramagnetism. The oscillations are similar to the Aharonov-Bohm effect, because the oscillation phase is set by the number of flux quanta through the area defined by the width of the sample and the distance between adjacent atomic layers. The magnetic response originates from the closed trajectories formed by counter-propagating open orbits coupled via specular boundary reflections. The phenomenon acts as a probe of the phase coherence of open electron trajectories.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Can an open Fermi surface generate a magnetic response, and what are the properties of this magnetic response?**
According to classical theory and the Lifshitz - Kosevich theory, orbital diamagnetism requires a closed orbit. Therefore, one might think that an open Fermi surface would not generate a magnetic response. However, the research in this paper shows that in a finite system, open orbits can indeed contribute to the magnetic response, and this magnetic response oscillates between diamagnetism and paramagnetism. These oscillations are similar to the Aharonov - Bohm effect because the oscillation phase is determined by the number of magnetic flux quanta in the area defined by the sample width and the spacing between adjacent atomic layers.
### Main problem analysis
1. **Magnetic response of the open Fermi surface**:
- The traditional view is that an open Fermi surface (i.e., a non - closed Fermi surface) does not generate a magnetic response because it lacks a closed orbit.
- However, this paper points out that in a finite system, open orbits can form closed trajectories through boundary reflection, thereby generating a magnetic response.
2. **Characteristics of the magnetic response**:
- This magnetic response oscillates between diamagnetism and paramagnetism, and the oscillation frequency is similar to that of the Aharonov - Bohm effect.
- The oscillation phase is determined by the number of magnetic flux quanta in the area defined by the sample width and the spacing between adjacent atomic layers.
3. **Physical mechanism**:
- The magnetic response originates from the closed trajectories formed by the counter - propagating open orbits coupled through boundary reflection.
- This phenomenon can be used as a probe to detect the phase coherence of open electron trajectories.
### Mathematical description
To describe this phenomenon more precisely, the paper introduces the following formulas:
- Energy dispersion relation:
\[
\epsilon(\kappa_x, k_z)=\epsilon_\parallel(\kappa_x)+2t_\perp\cos(k_z c)
\]
where \( c \) is the lattice constant along the \( z \) - direction, \( t_\perp \) is the inter - layer coupling strength, and \(\epsilon_\parallel(\kappa_x)\) is the general dispersion relation.
- Local momentum expression:
\[
\kappa_x(E, k_z, x)=\pm\left[k_x(E)-\frac{2t_\perp}{\hbar v_x(E)}\cos\left(\frac{k_z c}{\hbar}-\frac{e B x}{\hbar c}\right)\right]
\]
- Bohr - Sommerfeld quantization condition:
\[
S(E, k_z)=\oint\kappa_x(E, k_z)dx = 2\pi(n + \gamma)
\]
where \( n\in\mathbb{Z}\), and \(\gamma\) is the Maslov index.
- Magnetization intensity expression:
\[
M(\mu)=\frac{M_0}{\pi}\int_{FS}M(k_y,\mu)dk_y
\]
where \( M_0 \) is a normalization constant, and \( FS \) represents the Fermi surface integration path.
### Conclusion
This paper shows that an open Fermi surface can indeed generate a magnetic response in a finite system, and this magnetic response has unique oscillatory characteristics, similar to the Aharonov - Bohm effect. This provides a new perspective for studying the quantum interference phenomenon of open Fermi surfaces and lays the foundation for further exploring the magnetic behavior of related materials.