Exploiting the determinant factors on the available flexibility area of ADN's at TSO‐DSO interface
Abbas Rabiee,Ricardo J. Bessa,Jean Sumaili,Andrew Keane,Alireza Soroudi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.13088
IF: 3.034
2024-10-04
IET Renewable Power Generation
Abstract:The article investigates factors influencing the flexibility of active distribution networks (ADNs), including joint active and reactive power re‐dispatch of DERs, ADN's load model, parallel distribution networks, and upstream network parameters. Numerical results highlight the significance of these factors, emphasizing the need for accurate characterization of transmission and distribution network parameters to facilitate a smooth energy transition and the integration of hybrid renewable energy technologies into ADNs. Active distribution networks (ADNs) are consistently being developed as a result of increasing penetration of distributed energy resources (DERs) and energy transition from fossil‐fuel‐based to zero carbon era. This penetration poses technical challenges for the operation of both transmission and distribution networks. The determination of the active/reactive power capability of ADNs will provide useful information at the transmission and distribution systems interface. For instance, the transmission system operator (TSO) can benefit from reactive power and reserve services which are readily available by the DERs embedded within the downstream ADNs, which are managed by the distribution system operator (DSO). This article investigates the important factors affecting the active/reactive power flexibility area of ADNs such as the joint active and reactive power dispatch of DERs, dependency of the ADN's load to voltage, parallel distribution networks, and upstream network parameters. A two‐step optimization model is developed which can capture the P/Q flexibility area, by considering the above factors and grid technical constraints such as its detailed power flow model. The numerical results from the IEEE 69‐bus standard distribution feeder underscore the critical importance of considering various factors to characterize the ADN's P/Q flexibility area. Ignoring these factors can significantly impact the shape and size of Active Distribution Networks (ADN) P/Q flexibility maps. Specifically, the Constant Power load model exhibits the smallest flexibility area; connecting to a weak upstream network diminishes P/Q flexibility, and reactive power redispatch improves active power flexibility margins. Furthermore, the collaborative support of reactive power from a neighboring distribution feeder, connected in parallel with the studied ADN, expands the achievable P/Q flexibility. These observations highlight the significance of accurately characterizing transmission and distribution network parameters. Such precision is fundamental for ensuring a smooth energy transition and successful integration of hybrid renewable energy technologies into ADNs.
energy & fuels,engineering, electrical & electronic,green & sustainable science & technology