Abstract:The observation of small bodies in the Space Environment is an ongoing important task in astronomy. While nowadays new objects are mostly detected in larger sky surveys, several follow-up observations are usually needed for each object to improve the accuracy of orbit determination. In particular objects orbiting close to Earth, so called Near-Earth Objects (NEOs) are of special concern as a small but not negligible fraction of them can have a non-zero impact probability with Earth. Additionally, the observation of manmade space debris and tracking of satellites falls in the same class measurements. Telescopes for these follow-up observations are mainly in a aperture class between 1 m down to approximately 25 cm. These telescopes are often hosted by amateur observatories or dedicated companies like 6ROADS specialized on this type of observation. With upcoming new NEO search campaigns by very wide field of view telescopes, like the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, NASA’s NEO surveyor space mission and ESA’s Flyeye telescopes, the number of NEO discoveries will increase dramatically. This will require an increasing number of useful telescopes for follow-up observations at different geographical locations. While well-equipped amateur astronomers often host instruments which might be capable of creating useful measurements, both observation planning and scheduling, and also analysis are still a major challenge for many observers. In this work we present a fully robotic planning, scheduling and observation pipeline that extends the widely used open-source cross-platform software KStars/Ekos for Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface (INDI) devices. The method consists of algorithms which automatically select NEO candidates with priority according to ESA’s Near-Earth Object Coordination Centre (NEOCC). It then analyses detectable objects (based on limiting magnitudes, geographical position, and time) with preliminary ephemeris from the Minor Planet Center (MPC). Optimal observing slots during the night are calculated and scheduled. Immediately before the measurement the accurate position of the minor body is recalculated and finally the images are taken. Besides the detailed description of all components, we will show a complete robotic hard- and software solution based on our methods.

Lunar impact flash results and space surveillance activities at Kryoneri Observatory

NELIOTA: The wide-field, high-cadence lunar monitoring system at the prime focus of the Kryoneri telescope

NELIOTA: Methods, statistics and results for meteoroids impacting the Moon

NELIOTA: New results and updated statistics after 6.5 years of lunar impact flashes monitoring

NELIOTA: First temperature measurement of lunar impact flashes

PyNAPLE: Lunar Surface Impact Crater Detection

Investigating Remote-sensing Techniques to Reveal Stealth Coronal Mass Ejections

MIDAS: Software for the detection and analysis of lunar impact flashes

Ground-based Cislunar Space Surveillance Demonstrations at Los Alamos National Laboratory

An Image Simulator of Lunar Far-Side Impact Flashes Captured from the Earth-Moon L2 Point

Interests of a new lunar laser instrumentation on the ESO NTT Telescope

Location, orbit and energy of a meteoroid impacting the moon during the Lunar Eclipse of January 21, 2019

Extending Lunar Impact Flash Observations into the Daytime with Short-Wave Infrared

An autonomous lunar geophysical experiment package (ALGEP) for future space missions

Robotic observation pipeline for small bodies in the solar system based on open-source software and commercially available telescope hardware

Artemis-enabled Stellar Imager (AeSI): A Lunar Long-Baseline UV/Optical Imaging Interferometer

Lunar impact flashes from Geminids, analysis of luminous efficiencies and the flux of large meteoroids on Earth

Sensing technologies for the challenging Lunar environment

Mini-moons from horseshoes: A physical characterization of 2022 NX1 with OSIRIS at the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio Canarias

Simulation of Sky Surveys with the Flyeye Telescope