Abstract:Derivations under different grammar formalisms allow extraction of various dependency structures. Particularly, bilexical deep dependency structures beyond surface tree representation can be derived from linguistic analysis grounded by CCG, LFG, and HPSG. Traditionally, these dependency structures are obtained as a by-product of grammar-guided parsers. In this article, we study the alternative data-driven, transition-based approach, which has achieved great success for tree parsing, to build general dependency graphs. We integrate existing tree parsing techniques and present two new transition systems that can generate arbitrary directed graphs in an incremental manner. Statistical parsers that are competitive in both accuracy and efficiency can be built upon these transition systems. Furthermore, the heterogeneous design of transition systems yields diversity of the corresponding parsing models and thus greatly benefits parser ensemble. Concerning the disambiguation problem, we introduce two new techniques, namely, transition combination and tree approximation, to improve parsing quality. Transition combination makes every action performed by a parser significantly change configurations. Therefore, more distinct features can be extracted for statistical disambiguation. With the same goal of extracting informative features, tree approximation induces tree backbones from dependency graphs and re-uses tree parsing techniques to produce tree-related features. We conduct experiments on CCG-grounded functor–argument analysis, LFG-grounded grammatical relation analysis, and HPSG-grounded semantic dependency analysis for English and Chinese. Experiments demonstrate that data-driven models with appropriate transition systems can produce high-quality deep dependency analysis, comparable to more complex grammar-driven models. Experiments also indicate the effectiveness of the heterogeneous design of transition systems for parser ensemble, transition combination, as well as tree approximation for statistical disambiguation.

Is Japanese CCGBank empirically correct? A case study of passive and causative constructions

Distance-invoked Difficulty As a Trigger for Errors in Chinese and Japanese EFL Learners' English Writings

Constructions Are Catenae: Construction Grammar Meets Dependency Grammar

The properties of rare and complex syntactic constructions in English. A corpus-based comparative study

A Corpus-based Approach to Cognitive Semantic Analysis of English Neologisms——The Case Of“carbon Compounds”

Predicting Syntactic Choice in Mandarin Chinese: a Corpus-Based Analysis of Ba Sentences and SVO Sentences

Improved Combinatory Categorial Grammar Induction with Boundary Words and Bayesian Inference.

Semantic Processing Persists Despite Anomalous Syntactic Category: Erp Evidence From Chinese Passive Sentences

JCoLA: Japanese Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability

Large-scale CCG Induction from the Groningen Meaning Bank

Corpus-based Approach to Automatic Constructions of Japanese Verbal Case Frames

A Semantic Approach to Examining English Causative Constructions

Do Grammatical Error Correction Models Realize Grammatical Generalization?

A* CCG Parsing with a Supertag and Dependency Factored Model

Construction of Semantic Collocation Bank Based on Semantic Dependency Parsing.

Using cognitive model to automatically analyze Chinese predicate

Hierarchical Multitask Learning with Dependency Parsing for Japanese Semantic Role Labeling Improves Performance of Argument Identification

Syntax of causative-passive correlation from a cross-linguistic perspective

Category Locality Theory: A unified account of locality effects in sentence comprehension

Transition-Based Parsing for Deep Dependency Structures.

An Empirical Comparison of Probability Models for Dependency Grammar