Impact of modelling galaxy redshift uncertainties on the gravitational-wave dark standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant

Cezary Turski,Maciej Bilicki,Gergely Dálya,Rachel Gray,Archisman Ghosh
2023-10-10
Abstract:Gravitational wave science is a new and rapidly expanding field of observational astronomy. Multimessenger observations of the binary neutron star merger GW170817 have provided some iconic results including the first gravitational-wave standard-siren measurement of the Hubble constant, opening up a new way to probe cosmology. The majority of the compact binary sources observed in gravitational waves are however without bright electromagnetic counterparts. In these cases, one can fall back on the ``dark standard siren'' approach to include information statistically from potential host galaxies. For such a measurement, we need to be cautious about all possible sources of systematic errors. In this paper, we begin to study the possible errors coming from the galaxy catalogue sector, and in particular, look into the effect of galaxy redshift uncertainties for the cases where these are photometry-based. We recalculate the dark standard siren Hubble constant using the latest GWTC-3 events and associated galaxy catalogues, with different galaxy redshift uncertainty models, namely, the standard Gaussian, a modified Lorentzian, and no uncertainty at all. We find that not using redshift uncertainties at all can lead to a potential bias comparable with other potential systematic effects previously considered for the GWTC-3 $H_0$ measurement (however still small compared to the overall statistical error in this measurement). The difference between different uncertainty models leads to small differences in the results for the current data; their impact is much smaller than the current statistical errors and other potential sources of systematic errors which have been considered in previous robustness studies.
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the influence of the uncertainty of galaxy redshifts when using the gravitational - wave "dark standard siren" method to measure the Hubble constant \(H_0\). Specifically, the author studied the influence of different redshift uncertainty models on the measurement results of \(H_0\), especially when these uncertainties are based on photometry. By recalculating \(H_0\) in the latest GWTC - 3 events and related galaxy catalogs, the author explored the potential impacts of not considering redshift uncertainties and using different redshift uncertainty models (such as the standard Gaussian distribution, the modified Lorentz distribution) on the measurement results. ### Background of the Paper Gravitational - wave science is a rapidly developing field in observational astronomy. Multi - messenger observations, especially the binary neutron star merger event GW170817, have provided many landmark achievements, including the first measurement of the Hubble constant \(H_0\) by the gravitational - wave standard siren, which has opened up new avenues for exploring cosmology. However, most of the compact binary sources observed by gravitational waves do not have bright electromagnetic counterparts. In this case, the "dark standard siren" method can be used to statistically extract information from potential host galaxies. ### Research Motivation When using the dark standard siren method to measure \(H_0\), all possible sources of systematic errors need to be carefully handled. This paper focuses particularly on the redshift uncertainty in the galaxy catalog part, especially in the case based on photometry. The author recalculated the dark standard siren \(H_0\) using the latest GWTC - 3 events and related galaxy catalogs, and adopted different redshift uncertainty models, including the standard Gaussian distribution, the modified Lorentz distribution, and the case without considering uncertainties. ### Main Findings 1. **Not Considering Redshift Uncertainty**: Completely not using redshift uncertainty may lead to a bias comparable to other known systematic effects, but still relatively small compared to the overall statistical error. 2. **Influence of Different Uncertainty Models**: The differences between different redshift uncertainty models result in very small differences in the results under the current data, and their influence is far less than the current statistical error and other potential systematic errors. ### Conclusion The research in this paper shows that, under the current data set, the influence of redshift uncertainty on the measurement of \(H_0\) is relatively small. However, with the improvement of future observational precision and the accumulation of more events, these uncertainties may become more important. Therefore, further research and improvement of the redshift uncertainty modeling method are required to reduce potential systematic errors.