Distributed Optimization for Reactive Power Sharing and Stability of Inverter-Based Resources Under Voltage Limits

Babak Abdolmaleki,John W. Simpson-Porco,Gilbert Bergna-Diaz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2023.3303178

2023-02-28

Abstract:Reactive power sharing and containment of voltages within limits for inverter-based resources (IBRs) are two important, yet coupled objectives in ac networks. In this article, we propose a distributed control technique to simultaneously achieve these objectives. Our controller consists of two components: a purely local nonlinear integral controller which adjusts the IBR voltage setpoint, and a distributed primal-dual optimizer that coordinates reactive power sharing between the IBRs. The controller prioritizes the voltage containment objective over reactive power sharing at all points in time; excluding the IBRs with saturated voltages, it provides reactive power sharing among all the IBRs. Considering the voltage saturation and the coupling between voltage and angle dynamics, a formal closed-loop stability analysis based on singular perturbation theory is provided, yielding practical tuning guidance for the overall control system. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed controller for different case studies, we apply it to a low-voltage microgrid and a microgrid adapted from the CIGRE medium-voltage network benchmark, both simulated in the MATLAB/Simulink environment.

Systems and Control,Optimization and Control

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to simultaneously achieve reactive power sharing and voltage stability within voltage limits in inverter - based resources (IBRs). Specifically, the paper focuses on how to coordinate the reactive power distribution among IBRs through distributed control techniques in an AC network and ensure that the voltage of each IBR remains within its set safety range in the AC network. There is an inherent trade - off between these two goals, because accurate reactive power sharing may cause the individual node voltages to exceed their allowable ranges, and strict voltage regulation may affect the balanced distribution of reactive power. Therefore, the paper proposes a new control method aimed at optimizing these two conflicting goals simultaneously.

### Main contributions of the paper:
1. **Distributed control architecture**: A two - part controller is proposed: one is a local nonlinear integral controller for adjusting the voltage set - point of the IBR; the other is a distributed primal - dual optimizer for coordinating the reactive power sharing among IBRs. This architecture can maintain user - defined voltage constraints at all times while ensuring high - precision reactive power sharing.

2. **System stability analysis**: Using graph theory and the Lyapunov method, the steady - state of the system is analyzed, and the coupling between voltage and angle dynamics and the influence of voltage saturation are considered. Through time - scale separation and singular perturbation analysis, the stability conditions of the system are obtained, and practical guidelines for the selection of control parameters are provided.

3. **Simulation verification**: In the MATLAB/Simulink environment, two test systems are simulated, one is a low - voltage microgrid, and the other is a microgrid adapted from the CIGRE medium - voltage network benchmark model. The simulation results verify the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme.

### Key problems solved:
- **Trade - off between reactive power sharing and voltage stability**: By introducing a nonlinear integral controller and a distributed optimizer, the paper solves the problem of achieving high - precision reactive power sharing while ensuring that the voltage does not exceed the safety range.
- **Voltage saturation handling**: When the voltages of some IBRs reach the saturation state, the controller will exclude these IBRs from the reactive power sharing task, thereby avoiding punishing all IBRs and ensuring that other unsaturated IBRs can continue to achieve high - precision reactive power sharing.
- **System stability**: Through strict mathematical analysis, the stability and synchronization of the control system are ensured, especially in the case of voltage and angle dynamic coupling.

### Formula summary:
- **Voltage control**:
\[
V_i = V_{\text{set},i} = V^\star_i + \Delta_i \tanh\left(\frac{v_i}{\Delta_i}\right)
\]
\[
\tau_v \dot{v}_i = V^\star_i (\lambda_i - \frac{Q_i}{S_{\text{rated},i}}) - \beta \Delta_i \tanh\left(\frac{v_i}{\Delta_i}\right) - \rho_i(v_i) v_i
\]
where \(\rho_i(v_i) = \begin{cases}
\left|\frac{v_i}{\Delta_i}\right| - 3 & \text{if } |v_i| > 3\Delta_i \\
0 & \text{otherwise}
\end{cases}\)

- **Distributed optimization**:
\[
\tau_p \dot{\lambda}_i = \frac{Q_i}{S_{\text{rated},i}} - \lambda_i - \sum_{j \in N_i} a_{ij} (\zeta_i - \zeta_j) + k \sum_{j \in N_i} a_{ij} (\lambda_j - \lambda_i)
\]
\[
\tau_d \dot{\zeta}_i = \sum_{j \in N_i} a_{ij} (