Abstract:Objective: Drawing causal estimates from observational data is problematic, because datasets often contain underlying bias (eg, discrimination in treatment assignment). To examine causal effects, it is important to evaluate what-if scenarios-the so-called "counterfactuals." We propose a novel deep learning architecture for propensity score matching and counterfactual prediction-the deep propensity network using a sparse autoencoder (DPN-SA)-to tackle the problems of high dimensionality, nonlinear/nonparallel treatment assignment, and residual confounding when estimating treatment effects. Materials and Methods: We used 2 randomized prospective datasets, a semisynthetic one with nonlinear/nonparallel treatment selection bias and simulated counterfactual outcomes from the Infant Health and Development Program and a real-world dataset from the LaLonde's employment training program. We compared different configurations of the DPN-SA against logistic regression and LASSO as well as deep counterfactual networks with propensity dropout (DCN-PD). Models' performances were assessed in terms of average treatment effects, mean squared error in precision on effect's heterogeneity, and average treatment effect on the treated, over multiple training/test runs. Results: The DPN-SA outperformed logistic regression and LASSO by 36%-63%, and DCN-PD by 6%-10% across all datasets. All deep learning architectures yielded average treatment effects close to the true ones with low variance. Results were also robust to noise-injection and addition of correlated variables. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/Shantanu48114860/DPN-SAz. Discussion and Conclusion: Deep sparse autoencoders are particularly suited for treatment effect estimation studies using electronic health records because they can handle high-dimensional covariate sets, large sample sizes, and complex heterogeneity in treatment assignments.

Testing for causal effect for binary data when propensity scores are estimated through Bayesian Networks

A Bayesian nonparametric approach for evaluating the causal effect of treatment in randomized trials with semi-competing risks

Bayesian propensity scores for high-dimensional causal inference: A comparison of drug-eluting to bare-metal coronary stents

Estimation of Causal Effects of Multiple Treatments in Observational Studies with a Binary Outcome

Bayesian Nonparametric Modeling for Causal Inference

Estimating Causal Effects Under Interference Using Bayesian Generalized Propensity Scores

GBM Propensity Score Weighting for Causal Inference Research

Estimating Causal Effects from Large Data Sets Using Propensity Scores

Uncertainty in Propensity Score Estimation: Bayesian Methods for Variable Selection and Model-Averaged Causal Effects

Bayesian Nonparametric Model for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects With Zero‐Inflated Data

Nonparametric causal effects based on incremental propensity score interventions

What can the millions of random treatments in nonexperimental data reveal about causes?

Performance of Bayesian Propensity Score Adjustment for Estimating Causal Effects in Small Clinical Trials

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects of Binary Treatments in Unconfounded Studies with Dichotomous Outcomes

Testing causal effects in observational survival data using propensity score matching design.

Bayesian analysis for pretest-posttest binary outcomes with adaptive significance levels

Estimation of causal effects of binary treatments in unconfounded studies

Deep propensity network using a sparse autoencoder for estimation of treatment effects

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects via High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score