Abstract:We consider the finite-horizon offline reinforcement learning (RL) setting, and are motivated by the challenge of learning the policy at any step h in dynamic programming (DP) algorithms. To learn this, it is sufficient to evaluate the treatment effect of deviating from the behavioral policy at step h after having optimized the policy for all future steps. Since the policy at any step can affect next-state distributions, the related distributional shift challenges can make this problem far more statistically hard than estimating such treatment effects in the stochastic contextual bandit setting. However, the hardness of many real-world RL instances lies between the two regimes. We develop a flexible and general method called selective uncertainty propagation for confidence interval construction that adapts to the hardness of the associated distribution shift challenges. We show benefits of our approach on toy environments and demonstrate the benefits of these techniques for offline policy learning.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to effectively estimate the effect of deviating from the behavioral policy at a certain step in offline reinforcement learning (RL) within a limited time range, and construct the corresponding confidence interval (CI). Specifically, the paper focuses on how to select the policy at each step in the dynamic programming algorithm to maximize the effect of deviating from the behavioral policy while taking into account the uncertainty of future steps. This problem is very important in practical applications, especially in scenarios such as e - commerce recommendation systems, where users' behaviors may be affected by previous recommendations, resulting in changes in the state distribution. ### Main Challenges 1. **Change in State Distribution**: Compared with the contextual bandit (CB) problem, the main challenge in offline RL is that actions will affect the future state distribution, which makes the learning process more difficult. 2. **Statistical Complexity**: In the worst - case scenario, the learning sample complexity of offline RL may increase exponentially, while the sample complexity of the CB problem is relatively mild. 3. **Adapting to Instance Difficulty**: Different instances have different difficulties. Some instances are closer to the CB problem, while others are closer to the dynamic RL problem. Therefore, a method that can adapt to the difficulty of instances is required. ### Solution The paper proposes a method called **Selective Uncertainty Propagation** for constructing confidence intervals. The main features of this method include: 1. **Selectively Propagating Uncertainty**: When an action has no effect on the next - state distribution, do not propagate future uncertainty; when an action has an effect on the next - state distribution, selectively propagate uncertainty according to the magnitude of the effect. 2. **Adapting to Instance Difficulty**: By selectively propagating uncertainty, this method can smoothly transition between CB and RL, thus adapting to the difficulty of different instances. 3. **Theoretical Guarantee**: The paper provides a theoretical analysis to prove the effectiveness and adaptability of this method under different instance difficulties. ### Application Example The paper demonstrates the advantages of this method through simple simulation experiments. The experimental results show that the Selective Uncertainty Propagation method can provide tighter confidence intervals when dealing with instances of different difficulties, thereby improving the performance of offline policy learning. ### Related Work - **Multi - armed Bandit**: Studies how to improve statistical efficiency by means of exploiting the reward distribution, prior distribution of model parameters, etc. - **Reinforcement Learning**: Studies how to learn long - term planning through value functions, policies, or their combinations. - **Causal Inference**: Improves the statistical efficiency of CB and RL algorithms through insights from causal inference. In conclusion, by proposing the Selective Uncertainty Propagation method, this paper solves the statistical complexity problem brought by the change in state distribution in offline RL and provides theoretical and experimental support.

Selective Uncertainty Propagation in Offline RL

Uncertainty-aware Distributional Offline Reinforcement Learning

Bridging Distributionally Robust Learning and Offline RL: An Approach to Mitigate Distribution Shift and Partial Data Coverage

Offline RL Policies Should be Trained to be Adaptive

Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning for Non-Markovian Decision Processes

Expert-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Offline Policy Learning and Evaluation

Deterministic Uncertainty Propagation for Improved Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning

Offline RL With Realistic Datasets: Heteroskedasticity and Support Constraints

Instabilities of Offline RL with Pre-Trained Neural Representation

Offline Primal-Dual Reinforcement Learning for Linear MDPs

Offline Multi-task Transfer RL with Representational Penalization

Pessimism in the Face of Confounders: Provably Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes

Pessimism Meets Risk: Risk-Sensitive Offline Reinforcement Learning

Offline Policy Evaluation and Optimization under Confounding

One Risk to Rule Them All: A Risk-Sensitive Perspective on Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning

Adaptive Policy Learning for Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning

Pessimistic Bootstrapping for Uncertainty-Driven Offline Reinforcement Learning

Diverse Randomized Value Functions: A Provably Pessimistic Approach for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Near-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning via Double Variance Reduction

Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Data

Offline Data Enhanced On-Policy Policy Gradient with Provable Guarantees