Abstract:Background Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) permits the objective assessment of coronary artery disease. However, traditional edge detection algorithms often struggle with accurate vessel segmentation due to the complexity and variable quality of angiographic images. As a result, manual correction is frequently needed, which is a major limitation of current QCA systems. Purpose We developed angioPy, a deep learning-driven tool for vessel segmentation that employs user-defined ground truth points to minimise manual correction. We compared its performance without correction with an established QCA system. Methods angioPy was developed using 2455 images from the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 2 (FAME 2) study. Deep learning models were constructed using the U-Net architecture with one of three popular backbones for image classification: ResNet101, DenseNet121, and InceptionResNet-v2. Critically, the model was constructed to integrate the user's clinical expertise through the selection of a 5-10 ground-truth points along the length of the vessel of interest including the desired start and end point of vessel segmentation. These ground truth points were added to a separate channel of the input image. Five-fold cross validation was performed using proportions of 3:1:1 for training, validation, and test sets, respectively. External validation was performed on a separate dataset of 580 images not used for model development. For both datasets, ground truth segmentation masks were provided by interventional cardiologists using specialised in-house software. A separate analysis was performed in a cohort of 74 patients with mild/moderate stenoses that underwent vessel segmentation using both angioPy and an established commercial QCA package (Medis QFR®). Vessel dimensions at stenoses (proximal and distal reference, minimal luminal diameter) were extracted from both segmentation approaches and compared (609 diameters in total). Results The best performing model performed segmentation with an average F1 score of 0.927 (pixel accuracy 0.998, precision 0.925, sensitivity 0.930, specificity 0.999) with 99.2% of masks exhibiting an F1 score > 0.8 (Figure 1). Simliar results were achieved in the external validation set (F1 score 0.924, pixel accuracy 0.997, precision 0.921, sensitivity 0.929, specificity 0.999). Stenosis dimensions measured with angioPy (mean diameter 3.54 ±1.15 mm) exhibited excellent agreement with QCA (r=0.95 [95% CI 0.95-0.96], p<0.001; mean difference -0.18 mm [limits of agreement: -0.84 to 0.49]) (Figure 2). Minimal luminal diameter (mean 2.93 ±0.91 mm) also exhibited strong agreement (r=0.93 [95% CI 0.91-0.95], p<0.001; mean difference -0.06 mm [limits of agreement: -0.70 to 0.59]. Conclusion angioPy performs rapid and accurate coronary segmentation without the need for manual correction. Available as an open-source tool, angioPy has the potential to increase the efficiency and reliability of QCA.Figure 1.angioPy segmentationFigure 2.angioPy vs QCA (Medis)

Evaluation of stenoses using AI video models applied to coronary angiography

Automated Deep Learning Analysis of Angiography Video Sequences for Coronary Artery Disease

Automated stenosis estimation of coronary angiographies using end-to-end learning

Integrated deep learning model for automatic detection and classification of stenosis in coronary angiography

Automated Characterization of Stenosis in Invasive Coronary Angiography Images with Convolutional Neural Networks

CathAI: Fully Automated Interpretation of Coronary Angiograms Using Neural Networks

Artificial intelligence-based quantitative coronary angiography of major vessels using deep-learning

Automated Detection of Coronary Artery Stenosis in X-ray Angiography using Deep Neural Networks

Coronary Artery Stenosis and High-Risk Plaque Assessed With an Unsupervised Fully Automated Deep Learning Technique

Stenosis Detection and Quantification of Coronary Artery Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning

Accuracy of deep learning in the differential diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Automatic extraction and stenosis evaluation of coronary arteries in invasive coronary angiograms

Diagnostic performance of deep learning to exclude coronary stenosis on CT angiography in TAVI patients

Artificial intelligence-based opportunistic detection of coronary artery stenosis on aortic computed tomography angiography in emergency department patients with acute chest pain

Coronary computed tomography angiographic detection of in-stent restenosis via deep learning reconstruction: a feasibility study

angioPy: an open-source, deep learning-driven tool for coronary artery segmentation

Deep learning-based detection of functionally significant stenosis in coronary CT angiography

End-to-End, Pixel-Wise Vessel-Specific Coronary and Aortic Calcium Detection and Scoring Using Deep Learning

Automatic Quantitative Coronary Analysis Based on Deep Learning

Feasibility of the Anchor‐Free Deep Learning Method in Coronary Stenosis Automatic Detection

AngioPy Segmentation : An open-source, user-guided deep learning tool for coronary artery segmentation