Cedrix J. Dongmo Foumthuim,Achille Giacometti
Abstract:Using molecular dynamics and thermodynamic integration, we report on the solvation process in water and in cyclohexane of seven polypeptides (GLY, ALA, ILE, ASN, LYS, ARG, GLU). The polypeptides are selected to cover the full hydrophobic scale while varying their chain length from tri- to undeca-homopeptides provide indications on possible non-additivity effects as well as the role of the peptide backbone in the overall stability of the polypeptides. The use of different solvents and different polypeptides allows us to investigate the relation between solvent quality -- the capacity of a given solvent to fold a given biopolymer often described on a scale ranging from "good" to "poor", and solvent polarity -- related to the specific interactions of any solvent with respect to a reference solvent. Undeca-glycine is found to be the only polypeptides to have a proper stable collapse in water (polar solvent), with the other hydrophobic polypetides displaying in water repeated folding and unfolding events and with polar polypeptides presenting a even more complex behavior. By contrast, all polypeptides but none are found to keep an extended conformation in cyclohexane, irrespective of their polarity. All considered polypeptides are also found to have a favorable solvation free energy independently of the solvent polarity and their intrinsic hydrophobicity, clearly highlighting the prominent stabilizing role of the peptide backbone, with the solvation process largely enthalpically dominated in polar polypeptides and partially entropically driven for hydrophobic polypeptides. Our study thus reveals the complexity of the solvation process of polypeptides defying the common view " like dissolves like", with the solute polarity playing the most prominent role. The absence of a mirror symmetry upon the inversion of polarities of both the solvent and the polypeptides is confirmed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper aims to explore the effects of different solvents (water and cyclohexane) on the solvation processes of seven polypeptides (GLY, ALA, ILE, ASN, LYS, ARG, GLU). Specifically, the researchers hope to reveal the relationship between solvent quality (i.e., the ability of the solvent to fold biopolymers) and solvent polarity (i.e., the specific interactions between the solvent and the reference solvent) through molecular dynamics simulations and thermodynamic integration methods.
#### Research background and motivation
1. **Definitions of solvent quality and solvent polarity**:
- Solvent quality refers to the ability of a solvent to fold a given biopolymer, and is usually described on a scale from "good" to "bad".
- Solvent polarity is related to the specific interactions of the solvent relative to a reference solvent (such as water).
2. **Limitations of existing theories**:
- The traditional view is that "like dissolves like", that is, polar solutes are more stable in polar solvents and non - polar solutes are more stable in non - polar solvents.
- However, this simple relationship ignores the complex interactions between solutes and solvents, especially the role of the peptide chain backbone.
3. **Research objectives**:
- Explore the effects of different solvents on the solvation processes of polypeptides, especially their behaviors at different lengths and polarities.
- Verify the effects of solvent quality and solvent polarity on the stability of polypeptides, especially the role of the backbone in the solvation process.
- Explain why, in some cases, polypeptides do not collapse in non - polar solvents (such as cyclohexane), while they exhibit complex behaviors in polar solvents (such as water).
#### Main research contents
1. **Selection of polypeptide types**:
- Seven polypeptides (GLY, ALA, ILE, ASN, LYS, ARG, GLU) were selected. These polypeptides cover the entire range from hydrophobic to hydrophilic, and the chain lengths range from trimers to undecamers.
2. **Simulation methods**:
- Molecular dynamics simulations and thermodynamic integration methods were used to calculate the solvation free energies in different solvents (water and cyclohexane).
- Analyze the conformational changes of polypeptides in different solvents, including parameters such as root - mean - square deviation (RMSD), radius of gyration (\(R_g\)), and solvent - accessible surface area (SASA).
3. **Result analysis**:
- In water, undeca - glycine is the only polypeptide that can form a stable collapsed structure. Other hydrophobic polypeptides show repeated folding and unfolding phenomena, while hydrophilic polypeptides exhibit more complex behaviors.
- In cyclohexane, all polypeptides maintain an extended conformation, regardless of their polarity.
- The changes in solvation free energy indicate that the peptide chain backbone plays a crucial role in the overall stability of polypeptides. Especially in polar polypeptides, the solvation process is mainly driven by enthalpy, while in non - polar polypeptides, it is partly driven by entropy.
#### Conclusions
This study reveals the complexity of the polypeptide solvation process, challenges the traditional "like dissolves like" view, and emphasizes that solute polarity plays a more important role in the solvation process. At the same time, the study also finds that there is no mirror symmetry when the polarities of the solvent and the polypeptide are reversed, which further proves the important role of the peptide chain backbone in the polypeptide solvation process.
Through this study, the authors hope to provide a new perspective for understanding the behaviors of biomolecules in different solvent environments and provide valuable references for future experimental and theoretical studies.