Abstract:Students who eat breakfast more frequently tend to have a higher grade point average. From this data, many people might confidently state that a before-school breakfast program would lead to higher grades. This is a reasoning error, because correlation does not necessarily indicate causation -- X and Y can be correlated without one directly causing the other. While this error is pervasive, its prevalence might be amplified or mitigated by the way that the data is presented to a viewer. Across three crowdsourced experiments, we examined whether how simple data relations are presented would mitigate this reasoning error. The first experiment tested examples similar to the breakfast-GPA relation, varying in the plausibility of the causal link. We asked participants to rate their level of agreement that the relation was correlated, which they rated appropriately as high. However, participants also expressed high agreement with a causal interpretation of the data. Levels of support for the causal interpretation were not equally strong across visualization types: causality ratings were highest for text descriptions and bar graphs, but weaker for scatter plots. But is this effect driven by bar graphs aggregating data into two groups or by the visual encoding type? We isolated data aggregation versus visual encoding type and examined their individual effect on perceived causality. Overall, different visualization designs afford different cognitive reasoning affordances across the same data. High levels of data aggregation by graphs tend to be associated with higher perceived causality in data. Participants perceived line and dot visual encodings as more causal than bar encodings. Our results demonstrate how some visualization designs trigger stronger causal links while choosing others can help mitigate unwarranted perceptions of causality.

Visual Belief Elicitation Reduces the Incidence of False Discovery

Improving Visualization Interpretation Using Counterfactuals.

Trust Your Gut: Comparing Human and Machine Inference from Noisy Visualizations

The Impact of Elicitation and Contrasting Narratives on Engagement, Recall and Attitude Change with News Articles Containing Data Visualization

VISPUR: Visual Aids for Identifying and Interpreting Spurious Associations in Data-Driven Decisions

Illusion of Causality in Visualized Data

Can visualization alleviate dichotomous thinking? Effects of visual representations on the cliff effect

Beyond Correlation: Incorporating Counterfactual Guidance to Better Support Exploratory Visual Analysis

Visual Elements and Cognitive Biases Influence Interpretations of Trends in Scatter Plots

Guided By AI: Navigating Trust, Bias, and Data Exploration in AI-Guided Visual Analytics

Could Humans Outshine AI in Visual Data Analysis?

Adaptive Contextualization Methods for Combating Selection Bias During High-Dimensional Visualization

Guided By AI: Navigating Trust, Bias, and Data Exploration in AI‐Guided Visual Analytics

Using Counterfactuals to Improve Causal Inferences From Visualizations

Exploring the” Double-Edged Sword” Effect of Auto-Insight Recommendation in Exploratory Data Analysis

Data Visualization and Cognitive Biases in Audits

Visualization According to Statisticians: An Interview Study on the Role of Visualization for Inferential Statistics

An empirical study of counterfactual visualization to support visual causal inference