Abstract:In their article published in Phys. Med. Biol. 60 (2015) 4149-4168, Lin et al studied the radiosensitizing effect of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) using radiation transport simulations and a biological model for the survival of irradiated cells. This comment points out several caveats to the methodlogy used by Lin et al. that may not be evident to readers and may contribute to confusion in the literature about the radiation effects of gold nanoparticles. The two main caveats are the high mass fraction of gold considered and a potential problem with the modified local effect model used to predict cell survival.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to review the article "Biological modeling of gold nanoparticle enhanced radiotherapy for proton therapy" by Lin et al. published in "Physics in Medicine and Biology" in 2015. Hans Rabus pointed out that there are several problems in Lin et al.'s study that may not be obvious, and these problems may lead to confusion in the literature regarding the radiation effects of gold nanoparticles (GNPs). The main problems include:
1. **High - concentration gold**:
- The main nanoparticle size and concentration studied by Lin et al. are 50 nm and 1 micromolar (μM), respectively. Assuming the density of gold is \(\rho_{\text{Au}} = 19.32 \, \text{g/cm}^3\), a 50 - nm gold nanoparticle contains \(3.81\times 10^6\) gold atoms. Therefore, a 1 μM gold nanoparticle concentration corresponds to a gold atom concentration of about 3.8 mol/L, which means the gold mass density in the solution is 750 g/L, that is, the mass fraction of gold is about 43%!
- When irradiated with a 50 kVp photon spectrum, the energy range of most photons is such that the mass - energy absorption coefficients of gold and water differ by two orders of magnitude. Therefore, when gold nanoparticles are present, the photon flux that produces an absorbed dose of 1 Gy will result in an average dose of about 40 Gy. Therefore, it is not surprising that the predicted cell survival rate is almost zero for the 50 kVp photon spectrum.
- For low - energy photons, Lin et al. also studied the gold nanoparticle concentration range from 10 nM to 1 μM. A 10 nM gold nanoparticle concentration corresponds to a gold mass fraction of about 0.75%, which is still high but closer to the actual value. For the linear accelerator spectrum and protons, the increased average absorbed dose is much smaller. Lin et al. studied the concentration range from 100 nM to 10 μM, and the corresponding gold mass densities are between 75 g/L and 7.5 kg/L, and the mass fractions are between 7% and 88%, and these values are clearly unrealistic.
2. **Inconsistencies in the description of simulation settings**:
- In addition to the problem of high gold nanoparticle concentrations, the data in the "Materials and Methods" section seem to be contradictory. The article mentions: "1 μM of 50 - nm - diameter gold nanoparticles in nuclear, uniformly distributed cell and cytoplasmic geometries result in \(1.4\times 10^5\) gold nanoparticles (based on the volume of a cylinder with a diameter of 13.5 μm and a thickness of 2 μm)." These three geometries refer to the cases where gold nanoparticles are located only in the nucleus, uniformly distributed in the cell, and only in the cytoplasm, respectively. Obviously, the same number of gold nanoparticles cannot correspond to the same concentration in all three cases. For a given concentration, the number of gold nanoparticles must be different due to the different volumes of cells and nuclei.
- The volume \(V_c\) of a cylinder with a diameter of 13.5 μm and a height of 2 μm is:
\[
V_c=\left(13.5 \, \mu\text{m}\right)^2\times\frac{\pi}{4}\times 2 \, \mu\text{m}=2.86\times 10^2 \, \mu\text{m}^3 = 2.86\times 10^{-13} \, \text{L}
\]
- At a gold nanoparticle concentration of 1 μM, the number of gold nanoparticles \(N_{\text{GNP},c}\) in the cell is:
\[
N_{\text{GNP},c}=c_{\text{GNP}}\times V_c\times N_A = 1\times 10^{-6} \, \text{mol/L}\times 2.86\times 10^{-13} \, \text{L}\times 6.02\times 10^{23} \, \text{mol}^{-1}=1.72\times 10^5