Abstract:Purpose Interdisciplinarity is a hot topic in science and technology policy. However, the concept of interdisciplinarity is both abstract and complex, and therefore difficult to measure using a single indicator. A variety of metrics for measuring the diversity and interdisciplinarity of articles, journals, and fields have been proposed in the literature. In this article, we ask whether institutions can be ranked in terms of their (inter-)disciplinary diversity. Design/methodology/approach We developed a software application (interd_vb.exe) that outputs the values of relevant diversity indicators for any document set or network structure. The software is made available, free to the public, online. The indicators it considers include the advanced diversity indicators Rao-Stirling ( RS ) diversity and DIV* , as well as standard measures of diversity, such as the Gini coefficient, Shannon entropy, and the Simpson Index. As an empirical demonstration of how the application works, we compared the research portfolios of 42 “Double First-Class” Chinese universities across Web of Science Subject Categories (WCs). Findings The empirical results suggest that DIV* provides results that are more in line with one's intuitive impressions than RS , particularly when the results are based on sample-dependent disparity measures. Furthermore, the scores for diversity are more consistent when based on a global disparity matrix than on a local map. Research limitations “Interdisciplinarity” can be operationalized as bibliographic coupling among (sets of) documents with references to disciplines. At the institutional level, however, diversity may also indicate comprehensiveness. Unlike impact (e.g. citation), diversity and interdisciplinarity are context-specific and therefore provide a second dimension to the evaluation. Policy or practical implications Operationalization and quantification make it necessary for analysts to make their choices and options clear. Although the equations used to calculate diversity are often mathematically transparent, the specification in terms of computer code helps the analyst to further precision in decisions. Although diversity is not necessarily a goal of universities, a high diversity score may inform potential policies concerning interdisciplinarity at the university level. Originality/value This article introduces a non-commercial online application to the public domain that allows researchers and policy analysts to measure “diversity” and “interdisciplinarity” using the various indicators as encompassing as possible for any document set or network structure (e.g. a network of co-authors). Insofar as we know, such a professional computing tool for evaluating data sets using diversity indicators has not yet been made available online.

Measuring the diversity of data and metadata in digital libraries

Measuring diversity. A review and an empirical analysis

Divergence Measures as Diversity Indices

Measuring Diversity: Axioms and Challenges

Detecting the Research Diversity of Researchers in Library and Information Science: an Exploratory Study

Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological applications from the German Biodiversity Exploratories

The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections

Measuring Diversity of Artificial Intelligence Conferences

The Scientometric Measurement of Interdisciplinarity and Diversity in the Research Portfolios of Chinese Universities

A Measure for Transparent Comparison of Linguistic Diversity in Multilingual NLP Data Sets

An Axiomatic Analysis of Diversity Evaluation Metrics: Introducing the Rank-Biased Utility Metric

Perceptions of Diversity in Electronic Music: the Impact of Listener, Artist, and Track Characteristics

Evaluating the quality of linked open data in digital libraries

Measuring and Comparing Class Diversity in Archaeological Assemblages

Linguistic Diversity Index: A Scientometric Measure to Enhance the Relevance of Small and Minority Group Languages

How to partition diversity

Interdisciplinarity As Diversity in Citation Patterns among Journals: Rao-Stirling Diversity, Relative Variety, and the Gini Coefficient

Decomposing diversity into measures of evenness, similarity, and richness

Measuring Alpha and Beta Diversity by Field and Remote-Sensing Data: A Challenge for Coastal Dunes Biodiversity Monitoring

Simple Evaluation Metrics for Diversified Search Results.

Assessing Tree Species Diversity in Forest Ecosystems: A New Approach