Abstract:The root cause of human conflict needs to be understood but it is currently unknown whether the decision to engage in conflict is an inherited or acquired trait. This article reports two experimental simulations which demonstrate that the level of confrontation in a population of simple organisms can be explained by the evolution of a simulated gene pool. Game theory and evolutionary algorithms were combined in a novel way to examine how six variables influenced the decision to confront in the competition for resources. The main variable was how the genetically determined rate of confrontation evolved as a function of environmental resources and cost of a conflict. The additional modulatory effects of four other variables were also considered in the first round of simulations. Two variables were responsive to the difference between resources and cost. Two other variables were responsive to the organism's health status. Taking a systematic approach, we examined how a population of 1000 organisms were evolving in environments with different levels of reward and punishment. During each cycle, each organism was paired with another organism and thus needed to decide whether to confront or cooperate. We used a genetic algorithm to simulate the evolution of the gene pool over 500 cycles. The first series of simulations demonstrated that the baseline rate of confrontation was very responsive to environmental conditions. Our results also indicate that the decision to confront or cooperate depended not only upon the immediate competitive conditions, in which the organisms evolved, but were also responsive to their own health status. The second series of simulations used zero‐sum games to explore how risk levels varied as a function of the potential cost of engaging in a confrontation. In the second round of simulations, a simple form of memory was implemented. The results indicated that memory had a limited, but significant effect, while the cost of a conflict was highly predictive of the level of risk taken by the organisms. Our two series of simulations show that AI could contribute to answering psychological and societal questions. Our unique combination of techniques has brought to light several new insights into the mechanisms that drive the population towards cooperation and confrontation. The degree of generalizability of our results and future avenues for deepening our understanding of these evolutionary dynamics are discussed.

Survival of the nicest: have we got evolution the wrong way round?

Why are we nice? Altruism's origins are put to the test

The evolution of cooperation

The evolution of cooperation: an evolutionary advantage of individuals impedes the evolution of the population

Evolutionary dynamics within and among competing groups

Individualistic attitudes in Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma undermine evolutionary fitness and may drive cooperative human players to extinction

The edge of neutral evolution in social dilemmas

The evolution of altruism in humans

Dynamics of heuristics selection for cooperative behaviour

Should Evolution Necessarily be Egolution?

Half-Hearted Cooperation: A Theory of the Evolution of Altruistic Preferences

Evolution of cooperation with asymmetric social interactions

Evolutionary mechanisms that promote cooperation may not promote social welfare

Can recent evolutionary history promote resilience to environmental change?

Playing against the fittest: A simple strategy that promotes the emergence of cooperation

Altruism: Evolution and a Repercussion

The key role of cheaters in the persistence of cooperation

Evolutionary game theory and the tower of Babel of cooperation: Altruism, free-riding, parasitism and the structure of the interactions in a world with finite resources

Cooperation as well as learning: A commentary on 'How learning can guide evolution' by Hinton and Nowlan

How Natural Selection Can Create Both Self- and Other-Regarding Preferences, and Networked Minds

Evolution of confrontation and cooperation in simple organisms as a function of environmental resources and cost of a conflict