H12 Royal rashes: a potted dermatology history in the British monarchy
Charlotte Wolfe,Rachel Fisher
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljad113.294
IF: 11.113
2023-06-01
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract Skin diseases have affected a significant proportion of the population throughout history, royalty being no exception. On reviewing monarchs over the centuries, underlying health conditions can be gleaned from their reported skin conditions and physical appearance. In the 14th century, King Henry IV seized the throne from his cousin Richard II. Henry IV was debilitated by a skin disease thought to be leprosy or severe psoriasis, believed to be a punishment from God for being the first king to execute an archbishop. He is reported to have developed great pustules and eventually necrotic ulcers. King Henry VIII, famous for his six wives, also suffered with poor health during his reign from 1509 to 1547. By the age of 44 years, he was reportedly significantly obese, suffering from bilateral leg ulcers that became recurrently infected, leaving him unable to walk. The aetiology of the king’s ulceration may encompass a range of potential diagnoses. It is likely to have been as a result of venous disease with stasis dermatitis alongside trauma and obesity. Henry’s daughter Queen Elizabeth I, who reigned from 1558 to 1603, suffered from smallpox in 1562, which left her face scarred. Her physical scars were concealed with early forms of lead-laced makeup. She also reportedly suffered from hair loss. This may have been telogen effluvium secondary to stress, or it is possible that she suffered from female pattern hair loss. Alternatively, the application of lead to her face may have contributed to her alopecia. The following century, Queen Anne, the monarch that unified England and Scotland and took ownership of Gibraltar, is thought to have suffered from systemic lupus erythematosus. Portraits have demonstrated the classic malar rash, facial oedema and joint swellings. She also suffered many miscarriages and eventually a lethal stroke, raising suspicion for associated antiphospholipid syndrome. Moving to the 20th century, Prince William of Gloucester, a grandson of King George V, suffered from a photoexacerbated blistering skin rash. Three years later, he was diagnosed with porphyria, giving credence to the theory that the madness of King George III, one of William’s ancestors, was due to porphyria. However, this has been disputed, and manic–depressive psychosis is felt to be the more likely explanation. With up to 33% of the UK population suffering with skin conditions at any one time, a significant number of the current royal family will have a variety of skin diseases. How will their dermatological history be told in the future?
dermatology