[Infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: grave error in treatment?]

M Regauer,J Neu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-012-2172-5
Abstract:A 28-year-old patient showed clear signs of knee joint infection 8 days after arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. The treating physicians recommended further observation although they stated that a knee joint infection could not be reliably excluded. One week later arthroscopic revision was performed and intraoperative smear tests showed infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Therefore, another 6 days later the obviously infected transplant had to be removed. In the long run painful and limited range of motion of the affected knee joint persisted. The patient complained about medical malpractice concerning management of the complication. The expert opinion stated that due to the fateful course of infection the tendon graft could not be retrieved after the eighth day post surgery anyway. Thus, only flawed delay of treatment was criticized. The arbitration board argued, however, that scientific data concerning the fate of infected tendon grafts do not support the expert opinion and that immediate arthroscopy and antibiotic treatment at least had the potential to influence the course of infection in a positive manner. Evidence clearly shows that survival of an infected tendon graft depends on early diagnosis and emergency treatment rather than just on fate. Due to the fact that, although having in mind the possibility of a knee joint infection, the necessary therapy was delayed for 8 days, the arbitration board considered the described medical malpractice a severe treatment error, leading to reversal of evidence in favour of the patient.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?