The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse and their impact on other U.S. Banks

António Miguel Martins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2024.2302862
2024-01-14
Applied Economics Letters
Abstract:This paper examines how US banking industry responded to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse. The analysis of abnormal returns surrounding the announcement of the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse reveals a negative and statistically significant impact on the largest listed US banks. Banks' market value loss is explained by information asymmetries and uncertainty returns, systemic contagion, and panic. These reactions are reinforced or mitigated by bank-specific characteristics such as size, liquidity, profitability, risk aversion, operational efficiency, institutional ownership, internationalization, dependence on uninsured deposits and ratio of off-balance sheet items.
economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly discusses the impact of the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Credit Suisse on the US banking industry. Author António Miguel Martins studies the impact of these events on the market value of the largest listed banks in the United States through analyzing abnormal returns. The study found that there was a significant negative impact on the market value of large US banks before and after the announcement of the collapse of SVB and Credit Suisse, which can be attributed to information asymmetry, uncertainty, systemic contagion effect, and panic sentiment. The paper also analyzes how specific bank characteristics affect market reactions, such as size, liquidity, profitability, risk aversion, operational efficiency, institutional ownership, degree of internationalization, reliance on uninsured deposits, and the ratio of off-balance sheet items to total assets. The results show that banks with good financial health (high liquidity, profitability, operational efficiency, and market value), risk aversion, higher transparency, and less reliance on uninsured deposits are more able to withstand the negative impact caused by the collapse of the two banks. In addition, the study also found that institutional investors tend to have a negative reaction in high-risk events such as bank collapses and adjust their investment portfolios by shifting from bank stocks to relatively safer investments.