Abstract:Strategies to mitigate climate change can protect different types of cool environments. Two are receiving much attention: protection of ephemeral refuges (i.e., places with low maximum temperatures) and of stable refugia (i.e., places that are cool, have a stable environment, and are isolated). Problematically, they are often treated as equivalents. Careful delineation of their qualities is needed to prevent misdirected conservation initiatives; yet, no one has determined whether protecting one protects the other. We mapped both types of cool environments across a large (∼3.4M ha) mixed-use landscape with a geographic information system and conducted a patch analysis to compare their spatial distributions; examine relations between land use and their size and shape; and assess their current protection status. With a modest, but arbitrary, threshold for demarcating both types of cool environments (i.e., values below the 0.025 quantile) there were 146,523 ha of ephemeral refuge (62,208 ha) and stable refugia (62,319 ha). Ephemeral refuges were generally aggregated at high elevation, and more refuge area occurred in protected areas (55,184 ha) than in unprotected areas (7,024 ha). In contrast, stable refugia were scattered across the landscape, and more stable-refugium area occurred on unprotected (40,135 ha) than on protected land (22,184 ha). Although sensitivity analysis showed that varying the thresholds that define cool environments affected outcomes, it also exposed the challenge of choosing a threshold for strategies to address climate change; there is no single value that is appropriate for all of biodiversity. The degree of overlap between ephemeral refuges and stable refugia revealed that targeting only the former for protection on currently unprotected land would capture ∼17% of stable refugia. Targeting only stable refugia would capture ∼54% of ephemeral refuges. Thus, targeting one type of cool environment did not fully protect the other.

Genital blood flow measurement: feedback applications in sexual therapy.

Optimal Dynamic Allocation of Conservation Funding Among Priority Regions

Optimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate change

Efficiency and concordance of alternative methods for minimizing opportunity costs in conservation planning

Prioritizing global conservation efforts

Prioritizing threat management across terrestrial and freshwater realms for species conservation and recovery

Options for National Parks and Reserves for Adapting to Climate Change

An optimisation approach for planning preventive drought management measures

Modelling trade offs between public and private conservation policies

Improving the efficiency of conservation policies with the use of surrogates derived from remotely sensed and ancillary data

Synergistic Interaction of Climate and Land-Use Drivers Alter the Function of North American, Prairie-Pothole Wetlands

Climate and land-use changes reduce the benefits of terrestrial protected areas

Using Modern Portfolio Theory to Enhance Ecosystem Service Delivery: A Case Study from China.

Author Correction: Vulnerabilities of Protected Lands in the Face of Climate and Human Footprint Changes

Anticipating anthropogenic threats in acquiring new protected areas

Decision-Making for Land Conservation: A Derivative-Free Optimization Framework with Nonlinear Inputs

Introducing a novel methodology for designation and management of protected areas in the context of climate change: A case study in the Republic of Korea

Short (8-mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: a 3- to 14-year longitudinal study.

Assessing the Distribution and Protection Status of two Types of Cool Environment to Facilitate Their Conservation under Climate Change

Modeling Opportunity Costs of Conservation in Transitional Landscapes

Optimizing protected area expansion and enforcement to conserve exploited species