Abstract:Neural network pruning is a fruitful area of research with surging interest in high sparsity regimes. Benchmarking in this domain heavily relies on faithful representation of the sparsity of subnetworks, which has been traditionally computed as the fraction of removed connections (direct sparsity). This definition, however, fails to recognize unpruned parameters that detached from input or output layers of underlying subnetworks, potentially underestimating actual effective sparsity: the fraction of inactivated connections. While this effect might be negligible for moderately pruned networks (up to 10-100 compression rates), we find that it plays an increasing role for thinner subnetworks, greatly distorting comparison between different pruning algorithms. For example, we show that effective compression of a randomly pruned LeNet-300-100 can be orders of magnitude larger than its direct counterpart, while no discrepancy is ever observed when using SynFlow for pruning [Tanaka et al., 2020]. In this work, we adopt the lens of effective sparsity to reevaluate several recent pruning algorithms on common benchmark architectures (e.g., LeNet-300-100, VGG-19, ResNet-18) and discover that their absolute and relative performance changes dramatically in this new and more appropriate framework. To aim for effective, rather than direct, sparsity, we develop a low-cost extension to most pruning algorithms. Further, equipped with effective sparsity as a reference frame, we partially reconfirm that random pruning with appropriate sparsity allocation across layers performs as well or better than more sophisticated algorithms for pruning at initialization [Su et al., 2020]. In response to this observation, using a simple analogy of pressure distribution in coupled cylinders from physics, we design novel layerwise sparsity quotas that outperform all existing baselines in the context of random pruning.

On Iterative Neural Network Pruning, Reinitialization, and the Similarity of Masks

Adversarial Structured Neural Network Pruning

Rethinking the Value of Network Pruning

Connectivity Matters: Neural Network Pruning Through the Lens of Effective Sparsity

Studying the Consistency and Composability of Lottery Ticket Pruning Masks

Concurrent Training and Layer Pruning of Deep Neural Networks

Isomorphic Pruning for Vision Models

Recent Advances on Neural Network Pruning at Initialization

Fine Granularity Is Critical for Intelligent Neural Network Pruning

Investigating the Effect of Network Pruning on Performance and Interpretability

Multiple Sparse Spaces Network Pruning Via a Joint Similarity Criterion

No Free Prune: Information-Theoretic Barriers to Pruning at Initialization

Rethinking the Mechanism of the Pattern Pruning and the Circle Importance Hypothesis

Improve Convolutional Neural Network Pruning by Maximizing Filter Variety

One-Cycle Pruning: Pruning ConvNets Under a Tight Training Budget

Exploiting Channel Similarity for Network Pruning.

Complexity-Aware Training of Deep Neural Networks for Optimal Structure Discovery

What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?

Network Pruning Spaces

Students and teachers learning together: a robust training strategy for neural network pruning

ThinResNet: A New Baseline for Structured Convolutional Networks Pruning