Abstract:Aim/Background: BSA dosing leads to great inter-individual DTX PK variability, which is a major contributor for severe toxicity, especially in East-Asian populations. DTX exposure measured by area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) could positively predict DTX related neutropenia. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to assess the value of PK-guided DTX dosing on relieving toxicity.Methods: To date, 99 Asian advanced NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive single agent 3-weekly DTX chemotherapy for up to 6 cycles, either at a fixed standard dose of 75 mg/m2 by BSA (arm1) or at a PK-guided dose (arm2) with a same starting dose. AUC is calculated from a published PK model. Dose of subsequent cycles of arm2 patients is calculated base on previous cycle, according to optimal AUC target (2.5–3.7 µg•h/mL) algorithm. Dose reductions were permitted in both arms for toxicities. The study had a power of 80% to detect a 23% reduction of grade >3 neutropenia with PK-guided arm.Results: Patients' major characteristics were male (62.6%), non-smoker (58.6%), ECOG 0 (80.8%) and adenocarcinoma (74.7%). 1st cycle of dosing 75 mg/m2 for all patients show 11 folds of PK variability, with mean AUC of 4.53 (range 1.8-20.3, CV = 56%), only 29.2% were in the target. Major patients (59.4%) were over exposed to DTX, experienced 18.5% higher of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence. PK-guided dosing strategy could significantly reduce the dose of DTX, with a reduction of 8.6 mg/m2 (64.4 vs. 73.0, p < 0.001) in 2nd to 6th cycles. Patients therefore experienced 25.4% lower of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence in PK-guided dose arm (47.5% vs. 72.9%, p = 0.002). Overall response rate showed no differences between arm2 and arm1 (20.0% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.769), so is progression free survival (4.6 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.567).Conclusions: Majority of East-Asian NSCLC patients were over-exposed to DTX at a dose of 75 mg/m2. PK-guided dosing strategy could reduce DTX related neutropenia without efficacy damage.Clinical trial identification: NCT01891123Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Aim/Background: BSA dosing leads to great inter-individual DTX PK variability, which is a major contributor for severe toxicity, especially in East-Asian populations. DTX exposure measured by area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) could positively predict DTX related neutropenia. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to assess the value of PK-guided DTX dosing on relieving toxicity. Methods: To date, 99 Asian advanced NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive single agent 3-weekly DTX chemotherapy for up to 6 cycles, either at a fixed standard dose of 75 mg/m2 by BSA (arm1) or at a PK-guided dose (arm2) with a same starting dose. AUC is calculated from a published PK model. Dose of subsequent cycles of arm2 patients is calculated base on previous cycle, according to optimal AUC target (2.5–3.7 µg•h/mL) algorithm. Dose reductions were permitted in both arms for toxicities. The study had a power of 80% to detect a 23% reduction of grade >3 neutropenia with PK-guided arm. Results: Patients' major characteristics were male (62.6%), non-smoker (58.6%), ECOG 0 (80.8%) and adenocarcinoma (74.7%). 1st cycle of dosing 75 mg/m2 for all patients show 11 folds of PK variability, with mean AUC of 4.53 (range 1.8-20.3, CV = 56%), only 29.2% were in the target. Major patients (59.4%) were over exposed to DTX, experienced 18.5% higher of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence. PK-guided dosing strategy could significantly reduce the dose of DTX, with a reduction of 8.6 mg/m2 (64.4 vs. 73.0, p < 0.001) in 2nd to 6th cycles. Patients therefore experienced 25.4% lower of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence in PK-guided dose arm (47.5% vs. 72.9%, p = 0.002). Overall response rate showed no differences between arm2 and arm1 (20.0% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.769), so is progression free survival (4.6 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.567). Conclusions: Majority of East-Asian NSCLC patients were over-exposed to DTX at a dose of 75 mg/m2. PK-guided dosing strategy could reduce DTX related neutropenia without efficacy damage. Clinical trial identification: NCT01891123 Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Risk of serious toxicity in 1181 patients treated in phase I clinical trials of predominantly targeted anticancer drugs: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

Phase I Oncology Studies: Evidence That in the Era of Targeted Therapies Patients on Lower Doses Do Not Fare Worse

Outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated in a phase I clinic.

Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer

Toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic study

Incidence of Immune-Related Adverse Events and Its Association with Treatment Outcomes: the MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience

Supplementary Table S3 from Proportional Hazards Violations in Phase III Cancer Clinical Trials: A Potential Source of Trial Misinterpretation

424PD Individualization of docetaxel (DTX) treatment in East-Asian advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients based on pharmacokinetically (PK)-guided dosing strategy: an open-label randomized clinical trial

Toxicity Spectrum of Immunotherapy in Advanced Lung Cancer: A Safety Analysis from Clinical Trials and a Pharmacovigilance System.

Adaptive Dose Modification for Phase I Clinical Trials

Treatment-related Adverse Events, Including Fatal Toxicities, in Patients With Extensive-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Programmed Cell Death 1/Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors: A Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

An overview of chemotoxicity and radiation toxicity in cancer therapy

Toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations in solid tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical analysis of 1946 cases of adverse drug reactions associated with chemotherapy in cancer patients

Tolerability and toxicity profiles of antibody-drug conjugates for the treatment of malignant neoplasms: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Dynamic toxicity landscape of immunotherapy for solid tumors across treatment lines

Treatment-related adverse events of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapies in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Adverse reactions of targeted therapy in cancer patients: a retrospective study of hospital medical data in China

Evaluation of current practice: management of chemotherapy-related toxicities

Phase I study of single-agent anti-programmed death-1 (MDX-1106) in refractory solid tumors: safety, clinical activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates

Toxicity Profiles of Systemic Therapies for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis