Abstract:Children’s reasoning on food properties and health relationships can contribute to healthier food choices. Food properties can either be positive (“gives strength”) or negative (“gives nausea”). One of the main challenges in public health is to foster children’s dietary variety, which contributes to a normal and healthy development. To face this challenge, it is essential to investigate how children generalize these positive and negative properties to other foods, including familiar and unfamiliar ones. In the present experiment, we hypothesized that children might rely on cues of food processing (e.g., signs of human intervention such as slicing) to convey information about item edibility. Furthermore, capitalizing on previous results showing that food rejections (i.e., food neophobia and picky eating) are a significant source of inter-individual variability to children’s inferences in the food domain, we followed an individual approach. We expected that children would generalize the positive properties to familiar foods and, in contrast, that they would generalize more often the negative properties to unfamiliar foods. However, we expected that children would generalize more positive and less negative properties to unfamiliar sliced foods than to whole unfamiliar foods. Finally, we expected that children displaying higher levels of food rejections would generalize more negative properties than children displaying lower levels of food rejections. One-hundred and twenty-six children, aged 3–6 years, performed an induction task in which they had to generalize positive or negative health-related properties to familiar or unfamiliar foods, whole or sliced. We measured children’s probability of generalization for positive and negative properties. The children’s food rejection score was assessed on a standardized scale. Results indicated that children evaluated positively familiar foods (regardless of processing), whereas they tend to view unfamiliar food negatively. In contrast, children were at chance for processed unfamiliar foods. Furthermore, children displaying higher levels of food rejections were more likely to generalize the negative properties to all kinds of foods than children displaying lower levels of food rejections. These findings entitle us to hypothesize that knowledge-based food education programs should take into account the valence of the properties taught to children, as well as the state of processing of the food presented. Furthermore, one should take children’s interindividual differences into account because they influence how the knowledge gained through these programs may be generalized.

Physiological responses of food neophobics and food neophilics to food and non-food stimuli

EEG measures of attention toward food-related stimuli vary with food neophobia

Electrodermal activity as an index of food neophobia outside the lab

Food neophobia and ‘picky/fussy’ eating in children: A review

Food Neophobia in Children Aged 1-6 Years-Between Disorder and Autonomy: Assessment of Food Preferences and Eating Patterns

Habituation or sensitization of brain response to food cues: Temporal dynamic analysis in an functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Parent reports of young children's sensory characteristics are related to children's food neophobia

Neural Response to High and Low Energy Food Images in Anorexia Nervosa

Reduced food neophobia and food disgust in colorblind men

Tears for pears: Influence of children’s neophobia on categorization performance and strategy in the food domain

The relationship between food neophobia and hedonic ratings of novel foods may be mediated by emotional arousal

Olfactory performance and odor liking are negatively associated with food neophobia in children aged between 3 and 9 years

Distinct brain representations of processed and unprocessed foods

Neural responsiveness to Chinese versus Western food images: An functional magnetic resonance imaging study of Chinese young adults

Neophobia in 10 ungulate species-a comparative approach

Food neophobia and disgust, but not hunger, predict willingness to eat insect protein

Neurophysiological Responses to Different Product Experiences

Strength or Nausea? Children’s Reasoning About the Health Consequences of Food Consumption

Emotional responses to taste and smell stimuli: Self-reports, physiological measures, and a potential role for individual and genetic factors

Food Neophobia and Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake among Adults and Related Factors

How Sensory Properties Of Foods Affect Human Feeding-Behavior