Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Research Foundation Flanders Background Chest pain in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) may result from the valve stenosis itself, a coronary atherosclerotic lesion or even microvascular dysfunction (MVD). MVD in severe AS may be purely functional or the consequence of structural left ventricular (LV) remodelling. Unfortunately, there is no data available about invasive quantification of MVD using the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) in this patient group. Purpose To study the microcirculation in patients with severe AS by means of IMR and coronary flow reserve (CFR) and to determine the relation between these indices and standard echocardiographic parameters. Methods Forty-five patients with severe AS (according to the focused 2017 EACVI/ASE update) were prospectively included and underwent invasive intracoronary hemodynamic assessment and dedicated transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). On TTE we measured LV ejection fraction (EF), diastolic function parameters (E/A, e’ septal and lateral, E/e’, TR velocity), left atrial volume (index) (LAV(I)), aortic valve (AV) pressure gradients, the aortic valve area (index) (AVA(I)) and LV mass (index). The invasive measurements compromised the calculation of the CFR and IMR via thermodilution with the use of an intracoronary guidewire with a dual pressure and temperature sensor and administration of IV adenosine. Results Mean IMR and CFR were 22.9 ± 14.2 and 2.5 ± 1.5, respectively (Fig. 1). When using the commonly used cut-offs (increased IMR ≥ 25; impaired CFR < 2.0), 29% of patients had high IMR and 33% had low CFR. Patients with normal and high IMR had similar LV EF (p = 0.54), grade of diastolic dysfunction (DD)(p = 0.18), AV peak (p = 0.80) and mean pressure gradient (p = 0.86), AVA (p= 0.80), AVAI (p = 0.92), E/e’ (p = 0.97), LAVI (p = 0.75), LV mass (p = 0.34) and LV mass index (p = 0.59). In contrast, patients with impaired CFR had significantly lower AVA (0.63 vs 0.80 cm2, p = 0.033) and AVAI (0.32 vs 0.43 cm2/m2, p = 0.035) (Fig. 2A). Moreover there was a significant negative correlation between CFR and LAV (r= -0.354, p= 0.019) as well as LAVI (r= -0.428, p= 0.004)(Fig. 2C). Similarly, patients with different DD grades had no significantly different IMR values (p= 0.71), while there was a significant difference with their CFR values (Grade I: 2.9 ± 1.6; Grade II: 3.1 ± 1.7; Grade III: 1.8 ± 0.6, undetermined DD (due to Atrial Fibrillation): 1.6 ± 0.7, ANOVA p= 0.033) (Fig. 2B). Conclusion Approximately 30% of patients with severe AS exhibit MVD as assessed by IMR and CFR. In contrast to CFR, IMR values were not related to the severity of valve disease or systolic and diastolic function of the LV. Interestingly, the IMR was also not related to LV hypertrophy. IMR may therefore be the more objective and independent marker of microvascular disease, better suited to evaluate MVD in severe AS patients with chest pain. Abstract Figure 1 Abstract Figure 2

High cholesterol levels are associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction

Study Of The Correlation Between Blood Lipid Levels And The Severity Of Coronary Atherosclerosis In A Chinese Population Sample

Association Between Non-High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: a Single-Centre Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis

Blood haemoglobin, renal insufficiency, fractional flow reserve and plasma NT-proBNP is associated with index of microcirculatory resistance in chronic coronary syndrome

High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Is a Predictor of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease

Prognostic Impact of Diabetes Mellitus and Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization

The Role of Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Left Anterior Descending Artery ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Biomedical consequences of elevated cholesterol-containing lipoproteins and apolipoproteins on cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular outcomes

Diagnostic Value of Angiography-Derived IMR for Coronary Microcirculation and Its Prognostic Implication After PCI

Microcirculatory Resistance Based on a Single Angiographic View in ST- segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

Higher HDL cholesterol levels are associated with increased markers of interstitial myocardial fibrosis in the MultiEthnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

Increased circulating levels of malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction

Abstract 15954: The Impact of Lipid Rich Plaque on Microvascular Dysfunction Evaluated by Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Prognostic Value of Coronary Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

Cardiac tissue perfusion at rest correlates with systemic microvascular function in those with and without atherosclerotic coronary artery disease; a cross-sectional study

Diagnostic and prognostic value of angiography-derived index of microvascular resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Diagnostic performance and prognostic impact of coronary angiography‐based Index of Microcirculatory Resistance assessment: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Prognostic Implications of Microvascular Resistance Reserve in Symptomatic Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis

Link of renal microcirculatory dysfunction to increased coronary microcirculatory resistance in hypertensive patients

IMR or CFR - Which parameter is better suited to determine microvascular disease in patients with severe aortic stenosis?

The Influence of Epicardial Resistance on Microvascular Resistance Reserve