Abstract:Background: Endodontic treatment involves removal of the dental pulp and its replacement by a root canal filling. Restoration of root filled teeth can be challenging due to structural differences between vital and non-vital root-filled teeth. Direct restoration involves placement of a restorative material e.g. amalgam or composite, directly into the tooth. Indirect restorations consist of cast metal or ceramic (porcelain) crowns. The choice of restoration depends on the amount of remaining tooth, and may influence durability and cost. The decision to use a post and core in addition to the crown is clinician driven. The comparative clinical performance of crowns or conventional fillings used to restore root-filled teeth is unknown. This review updates the original, which was published in 2012. Objectives: To assess the effects of restoration of endodontically treated teeth (with or without post and core) by crowns versus conventional filling materials. Search methods: We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE via OVID, EMBASE via OVID, CINAHL via EBSCO, LILACS via BIREME. We also searched the reference lists of articles and ongoing trials registries.There were no restrictions regarding language or date of publication. The search is up-to-date as of 26 March 2015. Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-randomised controlled trials in participants with permanent teeth that have undergone endodontic treatment. Single full coverage crowns compared with any type of filling materials for direct restoration or indirect partial restorations (e.g. inlays and onlays). Comparisons considered the type of post and core used (cast or prefabricated post), if any. Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently extracted data from the included trial and assessed its risk of bias. We carried out data analysis using the 'treatment as allocated' patient population, expressing estimates of intervention effect for dichotomous data as risk ratios, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Main results: We included one trial, which was judged to be at high risk of performance, detection and attrition bias. The 117 participants with a root-filled, premolar tooth restored with a carbon fibre post, were randomised to either a full coverage metal-ceramic crown or direct adhesive composite restoration. None experienced a catastrophic failure (i.e. when the restoration cannot be repaired), although only 104 teeth were included in the final, three-year assessment. There was no clear difference between the crown and composite group and the composite only group for non-catastrophic failures of the restoration (1/54 versus 3/53; RR 0.33; 95% CI 0.04 to 3.05) or failures of the post (2/54 versus 1/53; RR 1.96; 95% CI 0.18 to 21.01) at three years. The quality of the evidence for these outcomes is very low. There was no evidence available for any of our secondary outcomes: patient satisfaction and quality of life, incidence or recurrence of caries, periodontal health status, and costs. Authors' conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to assess the effects of crowns compared to conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. Until more evidence becomes available, clinicians should continue to base decisions about how to restore root-filled teeth on their own clinical experience, whilst taking into consideration the individual circumstances and preferences of their patients.

The role of volume of multi-surface restorations in posterior teeth: Treatment options

Clinical evaluation of restoring posterior teeth residual roots and crowns with crown lengthening surgery

Effect of restoration volume on stresses in a mandibular molar: a finite element study

Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth

The effect of dental restoration geometry and material properties on biomechanical behaviour of a treated molar tooth: A 3D finite element analysis

Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root filled teeth

Decision making and management of root caries: A practice-based survey

Preference for Postendodontic Restoration for Fractured Anterior Teeth: A Questionnairebased Cross-sectional Study among Dentists in Maharashtra, India

The Pulpal Response to Crown Preparation and Cementation

The Influence of Dental Virtualization, Restoration Types, and Placement Angles on the Trueness and Contact Space in 3D-Printed Crowns: A Comprehensive Exploration

Treatment decisions of patients with Class II Division 2 malocclusion and severe tooth wear: a systematic review

Dimensions of Posterior Implant Restorations Related to Intra‐Coronal Cantilever and Occlusal Forces: An In Vitro Study

[Long-Term Treatment Outcome and Influencing Factors of Teeth Receiving Modified Crown Lengthening].

Prognostic Factors Affecting the Outcome of Surgical Root Canal Treatment—A Retrospective Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Cohort Study

Clinical Evaluation on Aesthetic Outcome of Anterior Tooth Restoration Using Crown Lengthening Surgery

The Impact of the Crown-Root Ratio on Survival of Abutment Teeth for Dentures

Is Coronal Restoration a Predictor of Posttreatment Apical Periodontitis?

Survey of screw‐retained versus cement‐retained implant restorations used in both education and private dental practices

In-depth morphological evaluation of tooth anatomic lengths with root canal configurations using cone beam computed tomography in North American population

Evaluation of the relationship between crown size and root canal morphology of mandibular incisors by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)

The Effect of Residual Dentition on the Dynamic Adjustment of Wear Facet Morphology on a Mandibular First Molar Crown