Abstract:We study the impact of the number and type of calibration parameters on surface‐subsurface hydrologic model performance. We employ a framework of sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis, and parameter estimation. We use results to evaluate parameterisation choices for two watersheds of diverse hydrologic features. We investigate the effect of calibration versus testing period length on the robustness of hydrologic model performance, providing insights into temporal considerations for model evaluation. Distributed, coupled surface‐groundwater hydrologic models are high‐dimensional, given the necessity to reflect the spatially diverse nature of complex hydrologic processes. Furthermore, inverse/inference problems involving these high‐dimensional models are naturally ill‐posed, given the limited information content of state observations that are typically assimilated. Many inversion/inference algorithms do not cope well with high dimensionality, leaving the practitioner to make subjective choices related to uncertain model inputs. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of these subjective calibration choices within a formal sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis, and parameters estimation (SA‐UA‐PE) framework on model testing for a surface‐subsurface hydrologic model. In doing so, we address the concepts of 'over‐parameterisation' and 'under‐parameterisation'. We completed a series of numerical experiments, testing several otherwise subjective aspects of the calibration process: (1) the number (5, 10, 15, 20) and type (soil, aquifer, land surface, channel) of calibration parameters selected); (2) the type of state observations assimilated (streamflow, groundwater head); and (3) the length of testing period (1 to 14 years), using monthly streamflow and groundwater head as testing data. The experiments were completed for models of the Winnebago River watershed (Minnesota, Iowa), (significant tile drainage) and the Nanticoke River watershed (Delaware, Maryland (significant groundwater‐channel interactions). The selected hydrologic model is SWAT+, using the gwflow module for physically based groundwater storage and flow modelling, and simulations are run for the 2000–2015 period. Through this process, we found that increasing the number of parameters from 5 to 15 improves the representation of streamflow, principally through an improvement of groundwater storage representation and baseflow generation, but minimal improvement when increasing to 20 parameters. Therefore, the SA‐UA‐PE process can be optimised based on an ideal number of parameters that yield adequate results while maintaining a lower computational burden. The method presented here can be used for any watershed, using integrated surface‐subsurface hydrologic models.

Addressing challenges associated with training sample sizes for effective calibration of NWP precipitation forecasts

Impact Of Two Calibration Strategies On Flow Simulation In Qiantang River Basin, China

On the Robustness of Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Models to Calibration and Evaluation Data Set Splits Selection: A Large Sample Investigation

Evaluation of Medium-Range Ensemble Flood Forecasting Based on Calibration Strategies and Ensemble Methods in Lanjiang Basin, Southeast China

Calibration of Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts with an Artificial Neural Network

Calibration of Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts from the RSM Ensemble Forecasts over Hydrologic Regions

Calibrating 2-m Temperature of Limited-Area Ensemble Forecasts Using High-Resolution Analysis

A statistical–dynamical approach for probabilistic prediction of sub-seasonal precipitation anomalies over 17 hydroclimatic regions in China

Quantifying the Role of Calibration Strategies on Surface‐Subsurface Hydrologic Model Performance

Enhancing Soil and Water Assessment Tool Snow Prediction Reliability with Remote-Sensing-Based Snow Water Equivalent Reconstruction Product for Upland Watersheds in a Multi-Objective Calibration Process

Benefit of Multivariate Model Calibration for Different Climatic Regions

Calibration of a Convective Parameterization Scheme in the WRF Model and Its Impact on the Simulation of East Asian Summer Monsoon Precipitation

The Transferability of Hydrological Models under Nonstationary Climatic Conditions

Improving the Accuracy of Subseasonal Forecasting of China Precipitation With a Machine Learning Approach

Lead-time-dependent calibration of a flood forecasting model

Short-Range Precipitation Forecasts from Time-Lagged Multimodel Ensembles during the HMT-West-2006 Campaign

Effects of single‐ and multi‐site calibration strategies on hydrological model performance and parameter sensitivity of large‐scale semi‐arid and semi‐humid watersheds

Objective Calibration of Numerical Weather Prediction Model: Application on Fine Resolution COSMO Model over Switzerland

Downscaling and Calibration Analysis of Precipitation Data in the Songhua River Basin Using the GWRK Model and Rain Gauges

Downscaling long lead time daily rainfall ensemble forecasts through deep learning

Verification and Calibration of the Short-Range (0–6 h) PQPFs from Time-Lagged Multimodel Ensembles Using LAPS