Spectrum of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Acute Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury - A Pictorial Essay
Cristina-Mihaela Popescu,Virginia Marina,Georgiana Avram,Carmen Cristescu Budala
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s466044
2024-06-20
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Cristina-Mihaela Popescu, 1 Virginia Marina, 2 Georgiana Avram, 3 Carmen Laura Cristescu Budala 3 1 Dental-Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "dun&abreverea de Jos" University, Galați, 800201, Romania; 2 Medical Department of Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dun&abreverea de Jos" University, Galați, 800201, Romania; 3 "sf. Ioan" Clinical Emergency Children's Hospital, Galați, 800487, Romania Correspondence: Virginia Marina, Tel +40-770-89-82-74, Email Head trauma (HT) in pediatric patients is the number one cause of mortality and morbidity in children. Although computer tomography (CT) imaging provides ample information in assessing acute traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), there are instances when magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is needed. Due to its high sensitivity in diagnosing small bleeds, MRI offers a well-documented evaluation of primary acute TBIs. Our pictorial essay aims to present some of the latest imaging protocols employed in head trauma and review some practical considerations. Injury mechanisms in accidental HT, lesions' topography, and hematoma signal variability over time are also discussed. Acute primary intra- and extra-axial lesions and their MRI aspect are showcased using images from patients in our hospital. This pictorial essay has an educational purpose. It is intended to guide young emergency and intensive care unit doctors, neurologists, and neurosurgeons in diagnosing acute primary TBIs on MRI while waiting for the official radiologist's report. The presentation focuses on the most frequent traumatic lesions encountered in acute pediatric head trauma. Keywords: paediatric head trauma, traumatic brain injury, diffuse axonal injury, haemorrhagic cortical contusions, epidural haematoma Children are susceptible to sustaining diverse types of traumas. If major traumas (as defined by Thompson et al 1 ) are rare in children - accounting for only 6% of all major traumas in both children and adults, 2 pediatric HT is the leading cause of Emergency Department visits worldwide. 3 Whether accidental or not, its effects can be devastating, 4 making it the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in children. 5,6 The best imaging tools must be used to evaluate the HT and take suitable measures for each patient. Algorithms such as the Paediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN), Children's Head Injury Algorithm for the Prediction of Important Clinical Events (CHALICE), and Canadian Assessment of Tomography for Childhood Head Injury (CATCH) are of critical importance to both clinicians and patients. They guide the former to rule out or ask for CT imaging. CT is still the gold standard for the initial evaluation of HT. 7–9 In cases where neurological deficits persist or new ones develop, and the initial head CT is normal, MRI is the next step in current practice, 10,11 particularly after moderate to severe HT. MRI is also useful to assess further the lesions previously described on the initial CT. 12 According to Yue et al, biomarkers, such as plasma concentrations of glial fibrillary acidic protein levels twenty-four hours post-trauma in patients with no CT traumatic lesions, might indicate those who need subsequent MRI. 13 Further research 14 confirms the correlation between plasma concentrations of glial fibrillary acidic protein levels, intracranial lesions absent on CT, and the need for further MRI neuroimaging. However, in pediatric patients, a meta-analysis 15 shows that S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) has the highest sensitivity in predicting TBIs, especially when associated with CT and clinical decision algorithms. CT-negative mTBIs lead to long-term non-specific symptoms, eg, dizziness, anxiety, loss of concentration, and irritability. 16 In children, MRI-detectable lesions one year after mild head trauma are encountered in almost 50% of the cases. 17,18 Although The ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Head Trauma-Child 10 does not recommend MRI for acute mild trauma, targeted sub-populations should be considered for additional MRI and TBI specialist follow-up. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, TBI is an injury to the brain that may be caused by a bump, blow, jolt, or penetrating injury to the head. 19 Although CT confers a complete and quick imaging evaluation in TBI, the risk of exposing young patients to ionizing radiation is high. Rapid MRI protocols have become more popular in pediatric TBI evaluation as an alternative to CT or an additional workup. 20 According to Lindberg DM and Shope C, rapid sequence MRI without anesthesia has also been impl -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services