An earpiece modification to facilitate nasotracheal intubation.

T. B. Gilbert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199003000-00020

1990-03-01

Abstract:Recent concerns about safety and pathogen transmission have caused many anesthesiologists to modify their techniques in a variety of situations, including that of blind nasotracheal intubation. Dorsey and Jones (l), for example, promoted the use of a disposable heatlmoisture exchanger to protect the operator from expelled secretions during blind nasotracheal intubation. Other authors have sought to distance the nasotracheal tube from the anesthetist’s ear by placing earmold tubing loosely inside the endotracheal tube (2) or by attaching a miniature microphone to amplify breath sounds (3). Reported here is a simple attachment to facilitate blind nasotracheal intubation, one that essentially eliminates direct respiratory contact with patients. This apparatus is made of readily available anesthetic gas analysis sampling parts and connects a standard oral-nasal endotracbeal tube to the operator’s earpiece (Figure 1). A straight elbow connector (PPG/Biomedical, SARA Straight Elbow, No. S215195001) attaches to the outer end of the endotracheal tube, and a male-male adaptor (Mallinckrodt, Male-Male Luer Lock Adaptor, No. 91229) allows the connection to the operator’s earpiece (Figure 2). Optionally, the addition of an in-line filter (PPG/Biomedical, SARA Filter Kit, No. 5215189001) further minimizes aerosol transmission. The entire disposable apparatus can be easily added to resuscitation kits, or carried in one’s coat pocket for instant attachment to the anesthetist’s ubiquitous earpiece. By providing a more direct conduit for sound to the ear, this device allows intubation of patients with faint respiratory sounds or in noisy environments (e.g., emergency room). Negligible resistance is added to the patient’s respiratory exchange. This device also eliminates the need for the anesthetist to bend over the patient’s body, a position that might make him or her unable to view mpnitoring equipment or to maintain proper vigilance. Having used this device recently for approximately 20 nasal intubations, I have had no difficulty in distinguishing the respiratory phases, or in assessing the tube’s proximity to the larynx. Similar results have been obtained by three other anesthesiologists in my department. Breath sounds are somewhat higher pitched, with the amplitude dependent on the length of connecting tubing between the nasotracheal tube and the earpiece; therefore, short lengths are recommended to avoid excessive dampening of the sounds. It is also suggested that the apparatus be removed before the attachment of a breathing circuit, as potentially high-pressure gas could be insufflated into the operator’s auditory canal.