Intra‐articular corticosteroid injections provide a clinically relevant benefit compared to placebo only at short‐term follow‐up in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Alessandro Bensa,Jacopo Albanese,Angelo Boffa,Davide Previtali,Giuseppe Filardo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12057
2024-02-01
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Abstract:Purpose To quantify the clinical relevance of intra‐articular corticosteroid effects compared to placebo for the injective treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods The PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched on May 3, 2023. This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in English, with no time limitation regarding publication date, comparing intra‐articular corticosteroids and placebo injections for knee OA. The effects were quantified at short‐ (≤6 weeks), mid‐ (>6 weeks and ≤3 months), and long‐term (≥6 months) follow‐ups. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the outcomes (visual analogue scale for pain ‐ VAS: 1.4, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index ‐ WOMAC: 9) was used to interpret the clinical improvement provided by intra‐articular corticosteroid injections compared to placebo. The quality of each article was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and the GRADE guidelines. Results Among the 1030 articles retrieved, 11 RCTs (842 patients) were included. A comparison of the two groups revealed statistically significant differences in the improvement of VAS and WOMAC scores in terms of the mean difference (MD); this difference was in favour of corticosteroids at short‐term (p
surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?