Abstract:The United States has not suffered significant psychosocial or medical consequences from the use of biological weapons within its territories. This has contributed to a "natural" state of denial at the community level. This denial could amplify the sense of crisis, anxiety, fear, chaos, and disorder that would accompany such a bioterrorist event. A key part of primary prevention involves counteracting this possibility before an incident occurs. Doing so will require realistic information regarding the bioterrorism threat followed by the development of a planned response and regular practice of that response. Unlike in natural disasters or other situations resulting in mass casualties, emergency department physicians or nurses and primary care physicians (working in concert with epidemiologic agencies), rather than police, firemen, or ambulance personnel, will be most likely to first identify the unfolding disaster associated with a biological attack. Like community leaders, this group of medical responders must be aware of its own susceptibility to mental health sequelae and performance decrement as the increasing demands of disaster response outpace the availability of necessary resources. A bioterrorist attack will necessitate treatment of casualties who experience neuropsychiatric symptoms and syndromes. Although symptoms may result from exposure to infection with specific biological agents, similar symptoms may result from the mere perception of exposure or arousal precipitated by fear of infection, disease, suffering, and death. Conservative use of psychotropic medications may reduce symptoms in exposed and uninfected individuals, as may cognitive-behavioral interventions. Clear, consistent, accessible, reliable, and redundant information (received from trusted sources) will diminish public uncertainty about the cause of symptoms that might otherwise prompt persons to seek unnecessary treatment. Training and preparation for contingencies experienced in an attack have the potential to enhance delivery of care. Initiating supportive social, psychotherapeutic, and psychopharmacologic treatments judiciously for symptoms and syndromes known to accompany the traumatic stress response can aid the efficient treatment of some patients and reduce long-term morbidity in affected individuals. Preventive strategies and planning must take into account the idea that specific groups within the population are at higher risk for psychiatric morbidity. First responders comprise one group at psychologic risk in this situation, and healthcare providers comprise another. These and other high-risk groups will benefit from the same supportive interventions developed for the community as a whole.

Ethical issues raised in addressing the needs of people with serious mental disorders in complex emergencies

Very Serious and Non-Ignorable Problem: Crisis in Emergency Medical Response in Catastrophic Event.

Ethical Challenges in the Provision of Mental Health Services for Children and Families During Disasters

Highlight the Importance of Psychological Service in Disaster Emergency Management

Mental Health Needs Due to Disasters: Implications for Behavioral Health Workforce Planning During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Geopolitical factors and mental health I

Ethical issues under the pressure of COVID-19 pandemic

An Exploration of Mental Health-Related Stigma in an Emergency Setting

Care in Emergencies and Disasters: Can It Be Person-Centered?

Occupational and Organizational Issues in Emergency Medical Services Behavioral Health

Ethics in disaster, mass casualty care, and critical care

Emergency mental health management in bioterrorism events

The leading role of expert safety knowledge in supporting the mission of caring for patients during man-made and natural disasters: state of emergency medicine in Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Ukraine

A Research Agenda for Assessment and Management of Psychosis in Emergency Department Patients

Medical Triage: Ethical Implications and Management Strategies

First Responders: Mental Health Consequences of Natural and Human-Made Disasters for Public Health and Public Safety Workers

Trends and ethical issues in nursing during disasters: A systematic review

Mental disorders, health inequalities and ethics: A global perspective

What Do You Do When You Can Do No More? Limited Resources, Unimaginable Environments, Personal Danger: What Have Previous Disasters Taught Us About Moral and Ethical Challenges?

The Public Health Consequences of Disasters

Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research