Hypoglycemia After Successful Pancreas Transplantation in Type I Diabetic Patients
D. Cottrell,M. Henry,T. O'dorisio,R. Tesi,R. Ferguson,K. Osei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.14.11.1111
1991-11-01
Diabetes Care
Abstract:retinopathy with cystoid macular edema, cotton-wool spots, and hemorrhages. Visual acuity was 20/30 (right eye) and 20/60 (left eye). She was treated initially with furosemide for the retinal edema, but visual acuity continued to deteriorate and was 20/60 (right eye) and 20/ 80 (left eye) at 19 wk gestation. Panretinal photocoagulation was performed with 2000 laser burns to each eye, and there was some improvement in visual acuity to 20/30 in both eyes by 27 wk gestation. At 28 wk gestation, the patient developed a marked increase in peripheral edema associated with hypertension (160/110 mmHg) and progression of nephropathy. Blood pressure was controlled aggressively with antihypertensive agents, but there was a deterioration in her retinopathy with the development of extensive proliferative lesions, for which she received further laser treatment in the left eye at 30 wk gestation. The patient gave birth to a healthy child at 33 wk gestation by lower-segment cesarean section, at which point visual acuity was 20/80 (right eye) and 20/60 (left eye). Urinary protein secretion was now 5.6 g/24 h, creatinine clearance 41 ml/min, plasma creatinine 152 M, and albumin 24 g/L. Postpartum, her retinopathy progressed in both eyes with further neovascularization, fibrosis, and preretinal hemorrhages on the right eye despite additional photocoagulation. She received a total of 4000 laser burns to the left eye and 3800 laser burns to the right eye. Eight months postpartum, the patient detached her right macula, necessitating vitreoretinal surgery. Her subsequent visual acuity was 20/80 (right eye) and 20/ 30 (left eye), and retinopathy was now quiescent. Metabolic control during and after pregnancy was excellent, with HbA1c values all within the normal range. This case history illustrates a type of severe retinopathy shown to regress postpartum in several studies (24). However, in this case, the retinopathy was only just contained by laser treatment during pregnancy, and in contrast to the expected course, it continued to deteriorate after delivery. Some researchers suggest a more judicious use of laser treatment in the pregnant woman with retinopathy and demonstrate a high rate of regression of the type of lesions seen in our patient toward the end of pregnancy and postpartum (3,4). In 1982, Moloney and Drury (2) reported progressive changes in background retinopathy in pregnant diabetic women that completely regressed to control levels 6 mo after delivery. New lesions occurring in a group of women with proliferative retinopathy also regressed, although not back to control values. Particular mention was made of a marked increase of streak and blob hemorrhages and soft exudates that completely resolved in the postpartum period. Ohrt (3) noted increased soft exudates, hemorrhages, and retinal edema in 23 of 100 pregnancies, all of which regressed postpartum. In contrast, although regression occurred in the cases of new proliferations, this was not nearly as complete. The preliminary report from a prospective study in Denmark supports these findings (4). Retinopathy in women at the onset of pregnancy deteriorated in 50% of the cases, but postpartum regression was common. Also, the development of proliferations was uncommon and also regressed by 6 mo postpartum. It was suggested that treatment with photocoagulation during pregnancy be restricted and close ophthalmological supervision be undertaken by a person familiar with the spontaneous course of retinopathy during diabetic pregnancy. Our case showed a poor response to photocoagulation during the pregnancy with further deterioration postpartum. Although evidence suggests that a more limited use of laser treatment in such cases might be a reasonable option, there are not yet any methods of predicting which patients will do well or means of selecting those who warrant more aggressive treatment. Until then, withholding laser treatment must be attendant with anxiety.