Abstract:Background There is a wide variety of observational methods for analyzing the biomechanical exposure of workers in the work environment. Valentim et al. (2023) performed a systematic review of these methods and identified 10 explicit observational methods of analyzing biomechanical exposure with high quality of evidence and good measurement properties. The lack of studies that analyze the criteria, the specificity and the way in which these methods evaluate the exposure factors, and their dimensions (frequency, intensity, and magnitude) stimulated this study. Objectives To present the characteristics and criteria of the 10 most observational methods with adequate reproducibility and validity measurement properties, and with acceptable quality of evidence. Methods This is an analytical and descriptive study of the 10 observational methods for analyzing the biomechanical exposure of workers identified in the systematic review by Valentim et al. (2023), being the most researched and with adequate properties for measuring reproducibility, validity, and acceptable quality. of evidence. Three professionals with knowledge and experience in using the methods carried out a weighted assessment, seeking to identify the main characteristics of each method (occupational task evaluated and main posture of analysis), in addition to data on risk factors, their dimensions and body segments of each method. Finally, the influence of each criterion on the risk exposure classification was evaluated, based on the partial and final scores. Results Among the evaluated methods, seven of them present characteristics and criteria that allow a general evaluation of the worker in any main posture. The most evaluated risk factors were joint position and range of motion. The EAWS method is the method that most evaluates biomechanical exposure factors (nine out of the ten listed). The ACGIH HAL TLV and RULA do not assess all biomechanical exposure factors. ROSA is the method that evaluates a greater number of body segments. The trunk and isolated segments, such as the shoulder and wrist, are present in the evaluation of seven of the ten methods. The EAWS, PATH, REBA, ROSA, and RULA methods assess the lower limbs in general. Most of the criteria (exposure factors and body segments) evaluated by the 10 observational methods have a great influence on the classification of risk exposure. Conclusion The EWAS, OWAS, PATH, QEC, REBA, RULA and SI methods evaluate any task in general. The ACGIH HAL TLV and ROSA methods are directed to specific tasks. The assessment of biomechanical factors and body parts vary between each method and the most complete and detailed observational method among all analyzed in this study is the European Assembly Worksheet (EAWS). Implications Getting to know the methods better is essential and will help both in choosing the most appropriate method for the analysis and in choosing more assertive preventive measures in the work environment. Contributing to the decision-making of professionals and favoring the reduction of work-related musculoskeletal disorders.

Methods to assess dermal exposures in occupational settings: a scoping review

Systematic review of methods used to assess exposure to pesticides in occupational epidemiology studies, 1993–2017

Analysis of dermal exposure assessment in the US Environmental Protection Agency Toxic Substances Control Act risk evaluations of chemical manufacturing

Accessible methods and tools to estimate chemical exposure in humans to support risk assessment: A systematic scoping review

Measurement of transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration and skin surface pH in occupational settings: A review

Evidence-based dust exposure prediction and/or control tools in occupational settings: A scoping review protocol

A harmonized occupational biomonitoring approach

In Vitro Human Dermal Absorption Studies on Pesticides in Complex Mixtures: Investigation of Guidance Criteria and Possible Impact Parameters

Protocol for a systematic review on systemic and skin toxicity of important hazardous hair and nail cosmetic ingredients in hairdressers

Occupational Exposure of Hairdressers to Airborne Hazardous Chemicals: A Scoping Review

Multidisciplinary Approaches for the Assessment of Human Exposure to Organic Pollutants in the Indoor Environment

Retrospective Exposure Assessment Methods Used in Occupational Human Health Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review

Occupational exposure to chemical substances and health outcomes among hospital environmental services workers: A scoping review of international studies

Identifying Dermal Uptake As a Significant Pathway for Human Exposure to Typical Semivolatile Organic Compounds in an E-Waste Dismantling Site: the Relationship of Contaminant Levels in Handwipes and Urine Metabolites

WHAT IS THE MOST COMPLETE OBSERVATIONAL METHOD OF ANALYSIS OF BIOMECHANICAL EXPOSURE IN THE CRITERIA USED?

Quantitative skin exposure assessment of metals: a systematic literature review of current approaches for risk assessment using the construction industry as an exposure scenario

Biomarkers of occupational benzene exposure: A Systematic Review to estimate the exposure levels and individual susceptibility at low doses

Comparative influences of dermal and inhalational routes of exposure on hazards of cleaning product ingredients among mammalian model organisms

Effect biomarkers of nanoparticle-exposed workers: A scoping review

Retrospective occupational exposure assessment for case-control and case-series epidemiology studies based in Shanghai China

Dermal Advanced REACH Tool (dART)-Development of a Dermal Exposure Model for Low-Volatile Liquids