Lessons learned from the failure of solanezumab as a prospective treatment strategy for Alzheimer's disease

Madia LozuponeVittorio DibelloRodolfo SardoneFabio CastellanaRoberta ZupoLuisa LampignanoIlaria BortoneRoberta StalloneMario AltamuraAntonello BellomoAntonio DanieleVincenzo SolfrizziFrancesco Panzaa Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience "DiBraiN",University of Bari Aldo Moro,Bari,Italyb Dipartimento Interdisciplinare di Medicina,Clinica Medica e Geriatria "Cesare Frugoni",University of Bari Aldo Moro,Bari,Italyc Department of Orofacial Pain and Dysfunction,Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA),University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,Amsterdam,the Netherlandsd Unit of Statistics and Epidemiology,Local Health Authority of Taranto,Taranto,Italye Local Healthcare Authority of Bari,ASL Bari,Bari,Italyf Neuroscience and Education,Human Resources Excellence in Research,University of Foggia,Foggia,Italyg Psychiatric Unit,Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine,University of Foggia,Foggia,Italyh Department of Neuroscience,Catholic University of Sacred Heart,Rome,Italyi Neurology Unit,IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli,Rome,Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2024.2348142
2024-04-30
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
Abstract:Introduction In the last decade, the efforts conducted for discovering Alzheimer's Disease (AD) treatments targeting the best-known pathogenic factors [amyloid–β (Aβ), tau protein, and neuroinflammation] were mostly unsuccessful. Given that a systemic failure of Aβ clearance was supposed to primarily contribute to AD development and progression, disease-modifying therapies with anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies (e.g. solanezumab, bapineuzumab, gantenerumab, aducanumab, lecanemab and donanemab) are ongoing in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with contrasting results.
pharmacology & pharmacy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?