Abstract:The quantum state preparation problem aims to prepare an <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$n$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-qubit quantum state <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$|\psi _{v}\rangle =\sum _{k=0}^{2^{n}-1}v_{k}|k\rangle $ </tex-math></inline-formula> from the initial state <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$|0\rangle ^{\otimes n}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, for a given unit vector <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$v=(v_{0},v_{1},v_{2},\ldots,v_{2^{n}-1})^{T}\in \mathbb {C}^{2^{n}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\|v\|_{2} = 1$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. The problem is of fundamental importance in quantum algorithm design, Hamiltonian simulation and quantum machine learning, yet its circuit depth complexity remains open when ancillary qubits are available. In this article, we study quantum circuits when there are <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$m$ </tex-math></inline-formula> ancillary qubits available. We construct, for any <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$m$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, circuits that can prepare <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$|\psi _{v}\rangle $ </tex-math></inline-formula> in depth <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\tilde O({}({2^{n}}/[{m+n}])+n)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and size <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$O(2^{n})$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, achieving the optimal value for both measures simultaneously. These results also imply a depth complexity of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\Theta ({}{4^{n}}/[{m+n}])$ </tex-math></inline-formula> for quantum circuits implementing a general <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$n$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-qubit unitary for any <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$m \le O(2^{n}/n)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> number of ancillary qubits. This resolves the depth complexity for circuits without ancillary qubits. And for circuits with exponentially many ancillary qubits, our result quadratically improves the currently best upper bound of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$O(4^{n})$ </tex-math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\tilde \Theta (2^{n})$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. Our circuits are deterministic, prepare the state and carry out the unitary precisely, utilize the ancillary qubits tightly and the depths are optimal in a wide parameter regime. The results can be viewed as (optimal) time-space tradeoff bounds, which is not only theoretically interesting, but also practically relevant in the current trend that the number of qubits starts to take off, by showing a way to use a large number of qubits to compensate the short qubit lifetime.

Low-depth Circuit Implementation of Parity Constraints for Quantum Optimization

Constant Depth Code Deformations in the Parity Architecture

Optimizing QAOA: Success Probability and Runtime Dependence on Circuit Depth

Enhancing Quantum Optimization with Parity Network Synthesis

Performance of Parity QAOA for the Signed Max-Cut Problem

Quantum Approximate Optimization With Parallelizable Gates

Flexible constraint compilation in the parity architecture

SWAP-less Implementation of Quantum Algorithms

Parity Quantum Optimization: Benchmarks

Asymptotically Optimal Circuit Depth for Quantum State Preparation and General Unitary Synthesis

Scalable Parity Architecture With a Shuttling-Based Spin Qubit Processor

Mapping quantum circuits to shallow-depth measurement patterns based on graph states

Deep-Circuit QAOA

Efficient Quantum Circuits based on the Quantum Natural Gradient

From barren plateaus through fertile valleys: Conic extensions of parameterised quantum circuits

Compiling Quantum Circuits for Dynamically Field-Programmable Neutral Atoms Array Processors

Parity Quantum Optimization: Compiler

Quantum State Preparation with Optimal Circuit Depth: Implementations and Applications

Dancing the Quantum Waltz: Compiling Three-Qubit Gates on Four Level Architectures

Optimizing Quantum Algorithms on Bipotent Architectures