Abstract:Constructing a quantum computer requires immensely precise control over a quantum system. A lack of precision is often quantified by gate-error metrics, such as the average infidelity or the diamond distance. However, usually such gate-error metrics are only considered for individual gates, and not the errors that accumulate over consecutive gates. Furthermore, it is not well known how susceptible the metrics are to the assumptions which make up the model. Here, we investigate these issues using realistic simulation models of quantum computers with flux-tunable transmons and coupling resonators. Our main findings reveal that (1) gate-error metrics are indeed affected by the many assumptions of the model, (2) consecutive gate errors do not accumulate linearly, and (3) gate-error metrics are poor predictors for the performance of consecutive gates. Additionally, we discuss a potential limitation in the scalability of the studied device architecture.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to address the vulnerability of gate - error metrics in quantum computers. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following points: 1. **Influence of gate - error metrics by model assumptions**: Existing gate - error metrics usually only consider the error of a single gate, while ignoring the cumulative effect of these errors in consecutive gate operations. Moreover, the sensitivity of these metrics to model assumptions has not been fully studied. 2. **Non - linear accumulation of consecutive gate errors**: The paper explores whether errors in consecutive gate operations accumulate in a linear manner and how this accumulation affects the overall performance. 3. **Effectiveness of gate - error metrics as performance prediction indicators**: The paper evaluates whether existing gate - error metrics (such as average fidelity and diamond distance) can effectively predict the performance of consecutive gate operations. 4. **Scalability limitations of device architectures**: The paper also discusses the scalability issues that the studied device architectures may face when implementing two - qubit gates. ### Main Findings 1. **Influence of gate - error metrics by model assumptions**: - Through simulation experiments, the paper finds that gate - error metrics are indeed influenced by model assumptions. This means that different model assumptions will lead to different gate - error metric results. 2. **Non - linear accumulation of consecutive gate errors**: - By simulating the time evolution under different numbers of ground states, the paper finds that consecutive gate errors do not accumulate in a linear manner but exhibit complex non - linear behavior. 3. **Effectiveness of gate - error metrics as performance prediction indicators**: - The paper finds that the initial gate - error metrics (such as diamond distance and average fidelity) cannot well predict the future gate - error trajectories. This indicates that these metrics have limitations in evaluating the overall performance of consecutive gate operations. 4. **Scalability limitations of device architectures**: - Through the spectral analysis of 4 - qubit NIGQC, the paper discusses the optimization problems that may be faced when implementing two - qubit gates. These problems may increase exponentially as the system scale increases, thus limiting the scalability of the device. ### Methods and Models - **Circuit Hamiltonian model**: Used to describe the dynamics of non - ideal quantum computers (NIGQC), including the interaction between resonators and tunable - flux transmons. - **Effective Hamiltonian model**: Used to describe the dynamics of tunable - flux transmons in a time - dependent basis, including non - adiabatic effects and charge - driven. - **Control pulses**: Including microwave pulses (MP), single - mode pulses (UMP) and two - mode pulses (BMP), used to implement single - qubit and two - qubit gate operations. ### Conclusion Through detailed simulation experiments, the paper reveals the vulnerability of gate - error metrics in quantum computing and proposes improved methods and suggestions. These findings are of great significance for designing more reliable quantum computing systems.

On the fragility of gate-error metrics in simulation models of flux-tunable transmon quantum computers

Note on simple and consistent gateset characterization including calibration and decoherence errors

Bounding the systematic error in quantum error mitigation due to model violation

Error Per Single-Qubit Gate below 10^-4 in a Superconducting Qubit

A protocol to characterize errors in quantum simulation of many-body physics

Problem-tailored Simulation of Energy Transport on Noisy Quantum Computers

Real-time simulations of transmon systems with time-dependent Hamiltonian models

Error metric for non-trace-preserving quantum operations

Error-mitigated Quantum Gates Exceeding Physical Fidelities in a Trapped-Ion System

Toward a Mølmer Sørensen Gate With .9999 Fidelity

Characterizing non-Markovian off-resonant errors in quantum gates

Limitations to Dynamical Error Suppression and Gate-Error Virtualization from Temporally Correlated Nonclassical Noise

Optimization of Algorithmic Errors in Analog Quantum Simulations

ANALYTIC SOLUTIONS FOR QUANTUM LOGIC GATES AND MODELING PULSE ERRORS IN A QUANTUM COMPUTER WITH A HEISENBERG INTERACTION

Robustness of near-thermal dynamics on digital quantum computers

End-to-end complexity for simulating the Schwinger model on quantum computers

Quantum advantage and stability to errors in analogue quantum simulators

Long-Time Error-Mitigating Simulation of Open Quantum Systems on Near Term Quantum Computers

Dynamical quantum maps for single-qubit gates under universal non-Markovian noise

Simulating quantum error mitigation in fermionic encodings