Abstract:In observational cohort mortality studies with prolonged periods of exposure to the agent under study, it is not uncommon for risk factors for death to be determinants of subsequent exposure. For instance, in occupational mortality studies date of termination of employment is both a determinant of future exposure (since terminated individuals receive no further exposure) and an independent risk factor for death (since disabled individuals tend to leave employment). When current risk factor status determines subsequent exposure and is determined by previous exposure, standard analyses that estimate age-specific mortality rates as a function of cumulative exposure may underestimate the true effect of exposure on mortality whether or not one adjusts for the risk factor in the analysis. This observation raises the question, which if any population parameters can be given a causal interpretation in observational mortality studies? In answer, we offer a graphical approach to the identification and computation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods. This approach is shown to be equivalent to an approach in which the observational study is identified with a hypothetical double-blind randomized trial in which data on each subject's assigned treatment protocol has been erased from the data file. Causal inferences can then be made by comparing mortality as a function of treatment protocol, since, in a double-blind randomized trial missing data on treatment protocol, the association of mortality with treatment protocol can still be estimated. We reanalyze the mortality experience of a cohort of arsenic-exposed copper smelter workers with our method and compare our results with those obtained using standard methods. We find an adverse effect of arsenic exposure on all-cause and lung cancer mortality which standard methods fail to detect.

Mindel C. Sheps: Counted, dead or alive

Shall we count the living or the dead?

A Potential Outcomes, and Typically More Powerful, Alternative to 'Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel'

Invited Commentary: Influence of Incomplete Death Information on Cumulative Risk Estimates

Identifiability of causal effects for binary variables with baseline data missing due to death.

Identifiability of Causal Effects for Binary Variables with Baseline Data Missing Due to Death

Analyzing Health Outcomes Measured as Bounded Counts

A Bayesian method for adverse effects estimation in observational studies with truncation by death

A new method to attribute differences in total deaths between groups to population size, age structure and age-specific mortality rate

Disagreement Concerning Effect-Measure Modification

Model Selection of the Effect of Binary Exposures over the Life Course

Measured and accounted-for confounding in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: Some thoughts for practitioners

Identifiability and estimation of causal effects by principal stratification with outcomes truncated by death

Double Bias: Estimation of Causal Effects from Length-Biased Samples in the Presence of Confounding

Relative risks, the probability of necessity, and attributable fractions

Rejoinder to Causal Inference Through Potential Outcomes and Principal Stratification: Application to Studies with "Censoring" Due to Death

Does citing early SIDS research skew contemporary conclusions?

A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect

Use of days alive without life support and similar count outcomes in randomised clinical trials – an overview and comparison of methodological choices and analysis methods

Systematically Missing Data in Causally Interpretable Meta-Analysis

Statistical Methods for Accommodating Immortal Time: A Selective Review and Comparison