Network-Controlled Repeaters vs. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for 6G mmW Coverage Extension

Reza Aghazadeh Ayoubi,Marouan Mizmizi,Dario Tagliaferri,Danilo De Donno,Umberto Spagnolini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.08033

2022-11-15

Abstract:Network-controlled repeaters (NCR) and reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) are being considered by the third generation partnership project (3GPP) as valid candidates for range extension in millimeter-wave (mmW, 30-300 GHz frequency) 5G and 6G networks, to counteract large path and penetration losses. Nowadays, there is no definite answer on which of the two technologies is better for coverage extension, since existing comparative studies focused either on communication-related metrics only or on very large-scale analysis, without physical layer details or environmental considerations. This paper aims at comparing NCR and RIS solutions in terms of coverage in an urban scenario. Numerical results suggest a possible usage of both technologies, showing that preferring RIS or NCR depends not only on their physical capabilities and cost (e.g., the number of antenna elements, the angular separation between panels for NCR, etc.) but also on environment geometry.

Signal Processing

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to effectively expand the network coverage in millimeter - wave (mmW, 30 - 300 GHz frequency) 5G and 6G networks to combat severe path loss and penetration loss. Specifically, the paper compares the coverage performance of two technologies - Network - Controlled Relays (NCR) and Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RIS) in urban environments. Both of these technologies are regarded as effective coverage - expansion candidates by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).

### Paper Background
With the development of future 6G communication systems, the millimeter - wave band has become a research hotspot due to its high bandwidth and large capacity. However, millimeter - wave propagation faces severe path loss and penetration loss, which limit the network coverage and link reliability. Currently, Massive Multiple - Input Multiple - Output (MIMO) systems overcome these challenges by using large antenna arrays, but in harsh or dense urban environments, their coverage and capacity performance are still not satisfactory. Therefore, cost - effective, low - power - consumption and sustainable technologies are needed to improve network performance.

### Research Questions
The paper aims to compare the coverage performance of NCR and RIS in urban environments, especially when considering static and dynamic blockages. Specifically, the paper explores the following questions:
1. **Physical - layer performance of NCR and RIS**: How do NCR and RIS perform at the physical layer in actual urban environments?
2. **Impact of environmental geometry**: How does the environmental geometry (such as building layout, street width, etc.) affect the coverage performance of NCR and RIS?
3. **Technical and economic factors**: Under different technical and economic conditions, which technology is more suitable for coverage expansion?

### Main Findings
- **Limitations of NCR**: The coverage ability of NCR is limited by the angular separation between antenna arrays and the Field of View (FoV) of coverage. High angular separation will reduce the flexibility of deployment, thus affecting the coverage range, but this is necessary to ensure an acceptable self - interference level. Therefore, NCR is suitable for environments where all User Equipment (UE) can be served within a limited FoV (e.g., open roads).
- **Advantages and challenges of RIS**: RIS shows a higher coverage ability, although its capacity is lower. The high coverage ability of RIS benefits from its reconfigurability and can adapt to different reflection angles. However, RIS requires a large number of elements, which brings challenges to the actual configuration.
- **Joint use of NCR and RIS**: In some cases, the joint use of NCR and RIS can further improve the coverage performance. The selection of specific parameters depends on the environmental geometry and technical requirements.

### Conclusion
The paper shows the coverage performance of NCR and RIS in different urban environments through numerical simulation and theoretical analysis. The results indicate that the choice between NCR and RIS should be determined according to specific application scenarios and technical - economic conditions. For application scenarios within a limited FoV, NCR is a natural choice; while for open areas, RIS is more appropriate. The joint use of NCR and RIS can provide better coverage in some cases.