Stochastic asymptotical regularization for nonlinear ill-posed problems

Haie Long,Ye Zhang
2024-08-26
Abstract:Recently, the stochastic asymptotical regularization (SAR) has been developed in (\emph{Inverse Problems}, 39: 015007, 2023) for the uncertainty quantification of the stable approximate solution of linear ill-posed inverse problems. In this paper, we extend the regularization theory of SAR for nonlinear inverse problems. By combining techniques from classical regularization theory and stochastic analysis, we prove the regularizing properties of SAR with regard to mean-square convergence. The convergence rate results under the canonical sourcewise condition are also studied. Several numerical examples are used to show the accuracy and advantages of SAR: compared with the conventional deterministic regularization approaches for deterministic inverse problems, SAR can quantify the uncertainty in error estimates for ill-posed problems, improve accuracy by selecting the optimal path, escape local minima for nonlinear problems, and identify multiple solutions by clustering samples of obtained approximate solutions.
Numerical Analysis
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the problems of stable solutions to nonlinear ill - posed problems and their uncertainty quantification. Specifically, the author extends the existing regularization theory by introducing the Stochastic Asymptotical Regularization (SAR) method and proves the regularization properties of SAR in terms of mean - square convergence. ### Problem Background Nonlinear ill - posed problems usually have the following characteristics: 1. **Existence of solutions**: Solutions may not exist. 2. **Uniqueness of solutions**: Even if solutions exist, they may not be unique. 3. **Stability of solutions**: Solutions are very sensitive to perturbations of the right - hand side, that is, a tiny input error may lead to a huge output error. For such problems, although traditional deterministic regularization methods (such as the Landweber iteration method) can provide a certain degree of stability, they have limitations in dealing with uncertainty and global optimal solutions. ### Advantages of the SAR Method The SAR method proposed in the paper has the following advantages: 1. **Quantifying uncertainty**: It can quantify error estimates in inverse problems and provide posterior (point - wise) error estimates. 2. **Revealing hidden information**: It can reveal and explain information that is masked in many practical problems due to incomplete mathematical modeling and large - scale noise. 3. **Improving accuracy**: It improves the accuracy of solutions by choosing the optimal path. 4. **Identifying multiple solutions**: It identifies multiple solutions by clustering approximate solution samples obtained. 5. **Avoiding local minima**: For some nonlinear inverse problems, SAR can effectively avoid getting trapped in local minima. ### Mathematical Model Consider the general nonlinear inverse problem: \[F(x)=y\] where the mapping \(F: D(F)\subset X\rightarrow Y\) is a nonlinear operator from the separable Hilbert space \(X\) to \(Y\). Given noisy data \(y^{\delta}\), satisfying: \[\left\|y^{\delta}-y\right\|\leq\delta,\quad\delta\in(0,\delta_{0}]\] The core of the SAR method is to apply continuous - time stochastic differential equations to the regularization process: \[dx^{\delta}(t)=F^{\prime}(x^{\delta}(t))^{*}(y^{\delta}-F(x^{\delta}(t)))dt + f(t)dB_{t},\quad x^{\delta}(0)=\bar{x}\] where \(B_{t}\) is an \(X\)-valued Q - Wiener process, and the auxiliary function \(f(t)\) controls the noise intensity. ### Convergence Analysis The paper analyzes the convergence of the SAR method in detail, including: 1. **Bias - variance decomposition**: Decomposing the total regularization error into a bias term and a variance term. 2. **Bias error estimation**: Estimating the bias error using classical regularization theory techniques. 3. **Variance error estimation**: Handling variance errors from infinite - dimensional stochastic integrals. ### Conclusion By introducing the SAR method, the paper not only solves the problem of stable solutions to nonlinear ill - posed problems but also provides a method for quantifying their uncertainty. Compared with traditional methods, SAR can provide more accurate and stable solutions in a wider range of scenarios, and can effectively avoid local minima and identify multiple solutions.