Abstract:The Universe may feature large-scale inhomogeneities beyond the standard paradigm, implying that statistical homogeneity and isotropy may be reached only on much larger scales than the usually assumed ∼100 Mpc. This means that we are not necessarily typical observers and that the Copernican principle could be recovered only on superHubble scales. Here, we do not assume the validity of the Copernican principle and let Cosmic Microwave Background, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, type Ia supernovae, local H 0 , cosmic chronometers, Compton y-distortion and kinetic Sunyaev–Zeldovich observations constrain the geometrical degrees of freedom of the local structure, which we parametrize via the ΛLTB model—basically a non-linear radial perturbation of a FLRW metric. In order to quantify if a non-Copernican structure could explain away the Hubble tension, we pay careful attention to computing the Hubble constant in an inhomogeneous universe, and we adopt model selection via both the Bayes factor and the Akaike information criterion. Our results show that, while the ΛLTB model can successfully explain away the H 0 tension, it is favored with respect to the ΛCDM model only if one solely considers supernovae in the redshift range that is used to fit the Hubble constant, that is, 0.023 < z < 0.15. If one considers all the supernova sample, then the H 0 tension is not solved and the support for the ΛLTB model vanishes. Combined with other data sets, this solution to the Hubble tension barely helps. Finally, we have reconstructed our local spacetime. We have found that data are best fit by a shallow void with δ L ≈ −0.04 and r L out ≈ 300 Mpc, which, interestingly, lies on the border of the 95% credible region relative to the standard model expectation.

Reconciling cosmic dipolar tensions with a gigaparsec void

A gigaparsec-scale local void and the Hubble tension

The sparkling Universe: the coherent motions of cosmic voids

A void in the Hubble tension? The end of the line for the Hubble bubble

Not empty enough: a local void cannot solve the $H_0$ tension

Tomographic redshift dipole: Testing the cosmological principle

Cosmology with voids

Do the observational data favor a local void?

Resolution of the incongruency of dipole asymmetries within various large radio surveys -- implications for the Cosmological Principle

The Cosmic Dipole in the Quaia Sample of Quasars: A Bayesian Analysis

The Lensing and Temperature Imprints of Voids on the Cosmic Microwave Background.

Gravitational Waves, CMB Polarization, and the Hubble Tension

Cosmic-void observations reconciled with primordial magnetogenesis

Discordance of dipole asymmetries seen in recent large radio surveys with the Cosmological Principle

Resolution of the incongruency of dipole asymmetries within various large radio surveys – implications for the Cosmological Principle

Theoretical systematics in testing the Cosmological Principle with the kinematic quasar dipole

Reassessment of the dipole in the distribution of quasars on the sky

A Bayesian approach to the cosmic dipole in radio galaxy surveys: Joint analysis of NVSS & RACS

QCD axion dark matter and the cosmic dipole problem

Constraints on the Local Cosmic Void from the Pantheon Supernovae Data