Abstract:We apply two approximate solutions of the quantum-classical Liouville equation (QCLE) in the mapping representation to the simulation of the laser-induced response of a quantum subsystem coupled to a classical environment. These solutions, known as the Poisson Bracket Mapping Equation (PBME) and the Forward-Backward (FB) trajectory solutions, involve simple algorithms in which the dynamics of both the quantum and classical degrees of freedom are described in terms of continuous variables, as opposed to standard surface-hopping solutions in which the classical degrees of freedom hop between potential energy surfaces dictated by the discrete adiabatic state of the quantum subsystem. The validity of these QCLE-based solutions is tested on a non-trivial electron transfer model involving more than two quantum states, a time-dependent Hamiltonian, strong subsystem-bath coupling, and an initial energy shift between the donor and acceptor states that depends on the strength of the subsystem-bath coupling. In particular, we calculate the time-dependent population of the photoexcited donor state in response to an ultrafast, on-resonance pump pulse in a three-state model of an electron transfer complex that is coupled asymmetrically to a bath of harmonic oscillators through the optically dark acceptor state. Within this approach, the three-state electron transfer complex is treated quantum mechanically, while the bath oscillators are treated classically. When compared to the more accurate QCLE-based surface-hopping solution and to the numerically exact quantum results, we find that the PBME solution is not capable of qualitatively capturing the population dynamics, whereas the FB solution is. However, when the subsystem-bath coupling is decreased (which also decreases the initial energy shift between the donor and acceptor states) or the initial shift is removed altogether, both the PBME and FB results agree better with the QCLE-based surface-hopping results. These findings highlight the challenges posed by various conditions such as a time-dependent external field, the strength of the subsystem-bath coupling, and the degree of asymmetry on the accuracy of the PBME and FB algorithms. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4799272]

A time-dependent regularization of the Redfield equation

Recovering complete positivity of non-Markovian quantum dynamics with Choi-proximity regularization

Taming the Bloch-Redfield equation: Recovering an accurate Lindblad equation for general open quantum systems

Dissipative quantum mechanics beyond Bloch-Redfield: A consistent weak-coupling expansion of the ohmic spin boson model at arbitrary bias

Derivation of the Redfield quantum master equation and corrections to it by the Bogoliubov method

Higher-order Corrections to the Redfield Equation with Respect to the System-bath Coupling Based on the Hierarchical Equations of Motion

A qubit regularization of asymptotic freedom without fine-tuning

A Mixed Quantum-Classical Liouville Study Of The Population Dynamics In A Model Photo-Induced Condensed Phase Electron Transfer Reaction

Redfield reduced dynamics and entanglement

Invalidation of the Bloch-Redfield Equation in Sub-Ohmic Regime via a Practical Time-Convolutionless Fourth-Order Master Equation

Benchmarking quantum master equations beyond ultraweak coupling

Non-Markovian character and irreversibility of real-time quantum many-body dynamics

Regularization of Riemannian optimization: Application to process tomography and quantum machine learning

Open system dynamics in interacting quantum field theories

A Perturbative Method for Nonequilibrium Steady State of Open Quantum Systems

Relaxation dynamics of an unlike spin pair system

Quantum Simulation of Lindbladian Dynamics via Repeated Interactions

Local generation of entanglement with Redfield dynamics

Effective time-dependent temperature for fermionic master equations beyond the Markov and the secular approximations

Intermediate Times Dilemma for Open Quantum System: Filtered Approximation to The Refined Weak Coupling Limit