Addressing interpersonal harm in online gaming communities: the opportunities and challenges for a restorative justice approach

Sijia Xiao,Shagun Jhaver,Niloufar Salehi

2023-06-08

Abstract:Most social media platforms implement content moderation to address interpersonal harms such as harassment. Content moderation relies on offender-centered, punitive approaches, e.g., bans and content removal. We consider an alternative justice framework, restorative justice, which aids victims in healing, supports offenders in repairing the harm, and engages community members in addressing the harm collectively. To assess the utility of restorative justice in addressing online harm, we interviewed 23 users from Overwatch gaming communities, including moderators, victims, and offenders; such communities are particularly susceptible to harm, with nearly three quarters of all online game players suffering from some form of online abuse. We study how the communities currently handle harm cases through the lens of restorative justice and examine their attitudes toward implementing restorative justice processes. Our analysis reveals that cultural, technical, and resource-related obstacles hinder implementation of restorative justice within the existing punitive framework despite online community needs and existing structures to support it. We discuss how current content moderation systems can embed restorative justice goals and practices and overcome these challenges.

Human-Computer Interaction

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore how to adopt restorative justice approaches to address interpersonal harm in online gaming communities. By analyzing cases within the Overwatch gaming community, the researchers assessed whether current content moderation mechanisms effectively address online harm and explored the feasibility and challenges of implementing a restorative justice framework.

The core issue of the paper is that existing punitive content moderation methods fail to effectively resolve ongoing interpersonal harm. Although many social media platforms have adopted content moderation measures, such as banning offending users or removing inappropriate content, these methods often focus on punishing the perpetrator rather than supporting the victim's healing. Additionally, community members may exacerbate harm due to a lack of understanding of the victim's experience.

Through interviews with victims, perpetrators, and administrators, the researchers identified the following shortcomings in the current mechanisms:
1. **Punishment-Centric**: Current content moderation primarily focuses on punishing offenders, neglecting the needs of victims.
2. **Lack of Accountability**: Perpetrators often only focus on the punishment they receive rather than the harm they have caused.
3. **Negative Role of Community Culture**: Community members with a punitive mindset may further exacerbate harm.

The paper also points out that applying restorative justice in an online environment is not easy, with structural, cultural, and resource-related barriers. However, the research also found some instances where current moderation practices align with restorative justice principles and proposed some methods participants have tried to implement restorative justice within their communities. The researchers believe that by introducing restorative justice tools and processes, harm in online gaming communities can be better addressed, thereby improving community culture.