Abstract:Social science theories often postulate causal relationships among a set of variables or events. Although directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are increasingly used to represent these theories, their full potential has not yet been realized in practice. As non-parametric causal models, DAGs require no assumptions about the functional form of the hypothesized relationships. Nevertheless, to simplify the task of empirical evaluation, researchers tend to invoke such assumptions anyway, even though they are typically arbitrary and do not reflect any theoretical content or prior knowledge. Moreover, functional form assumptions can engender bias, whenever they fail to accurately capture the complexity of the causal system under investigation. In this article, we introduce causal-graphical normalizing flows (cGNFs), a novel approach to causal inference that leverages deep neural networks to empirically evaluate theories represented as DAGs. Unlike conventional approaches, cGNFs model the full joint distribution of the data according to a DAG supplied by the analyst, without relying on stringent assumptions about functional form. In this way, the method allows for flexible, semi-parametric estimation of any causal estimand that can be identified from the DAG, including total effects, conditional effects, direct and indirect effects, and path-specific effects. We illustrate the method with a reanalysis of Blau and Duncan's (1967) model of status attainment and Zhou's (2019) model of conditional versus controlled mobility. To facilitate adoption, we provide open-source software together with a series of online tutorials for implementing cGNFs. The article concludes with a discussion of current limitations and directions for future development.

Causal DAG extraction from a library of books or videos/movies

Learning Cluster Causal Diagrams: an Information-Theoretic Approach

Idag: Invariant DAG Searching for Domain Generalization

Deep Learning With DAGs

Argumentative Causal Discovery

DAG With Omitted Objects Displayed (DAGWOOD): A framework for revealing causal assumptions in DAGs

Invited Commentary: Where Do the Causal DAGs Come From?

Learning and inferring causality from video

Causal Data Integration

Algorithms for Causal Reasoning in Probability Trees

Drawing and Analyzing Causal DAGs with DAGitty

A Human-Centered Approach for Bootstrapping Causal Graph Creation

Credible causal inference beyond toy models

Stable Differentiable Causal Discovery

Causal Induction from Visual Observations for Goal Directed Tasks

Reinterpreting causal discovery as the task of predicting unobserved joint statistics

Supervised Whole DAG Causal Discovery

Everything Has a Cause: Leveraging Causal Inference in Legal Text Analysis

Causal Discovery from Incomplete Data using An Encoder and Reinforcement Learning

What Is a Causal Graph?

Interventional Causal Discovery in a Mixture of DAGs