Edge channels in a graphene Fabry-Perot interferometer

S. Ihnatsenka

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.235422

2023-10-22

Abstract:Quantum-mechanical calculations of electron magnetotransport in graphene Fabry-Pérot interferometers are presented with a focus on the role of spatial structure of edge channels. For an interferometer that is made by removing carbon atoms, which is typically realized in nanolithography experiments, the constrictions are shown to cause strong inter-channel scattering that establishes local equilibrium and makes the electron transport non-adiabatic. Nevertheless, two-terminal conductance reveals a common Aharonov-Bohm oscillation pattern, independent of crystallographic orientation, which is accompanied by single-particle states that sweep through the Fermi energy for the edge channels circulating along the physical boundary of the device. The interferometer constrictions host the localized states that might shorten the device or disrupt the oscillation pattern. For an interferometer that is created by electrostatic confinement, which is typically done in the split-gate experiments, electron transport is shown to be adiabatic if the staggered potential is introduced additionally into the model. Interference visibility decays exponentially with temperature with a weaker dependence at low temperature.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the paper attempts to solve

This paper aims to explore the quantum - mechanical mechanism of electron magnetic transport in the graphene Fabry - Pérot interferometer, especially the role of the spatial structure of edge channels therein. Specifically, the paper attempts to solve the following key problems:

1. **Understanding the physical mechanism of edge channels**:
- In the graphene interferometer fabricated by removing carbon atoms or electrostatic confinement, how do edge channels affect electron transport?
- Does the localized state of edge channels affect the interference pattern?

2. **Interpreting experimental phenomena**:
- Explain why the Aharonov - Bohm (AB) oscillation patterns are similar in graphene interferometers with different lattice orientations.
- Investigate the influence of strong scattering on the graphene interface, especially in etching nanofabrication experiments.

3. **Comparing differences in different manufacturing methods**:
- Compare the differences between interferometers fabricated by removing carbon atoms and by electrostatic confinement, especially in terms of non - adiabaticity and adiabaticity of electron transport.

4. **Temperature dependence**:
- Study the variation law of interference visibility with temperature, verify experimental results and provide theoretical explanations.

5. **Proposing a microscopic theoretical model**:
- Propose a microscopic theoretical model that does not depend on any phenomenological parameters (such as the transmission amplitude in the confinement region) to describe electron magnetic transport in the graphene interferometer and explain the underlying physical mechanism.

### Formulas and expressions

The paper involves multiple formulas for describing the Hamiltonian, Green's function, conductivity, etc. of the system. These formulas are represented in Markdown format as follows:

#### Hamiltonian
\[
H = \sum_{i} \epsilon_i a_i^\dagger a_i - \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} t_{ij} (a_i^\dagger a_j + \text{H.c.})
\]
where $\epsilon_i$ is the local energy, $a_i^\dagger$ and $a_i$ are the creation and annihilation operators of electrons at the $i$-th site respectively, and the angle brackets represent the nearest - neighbor indices.

#### Magnetic field introduction
The magnetic field $B$ is introduced through Peierls substitution:
\[
t_{ij} = t \exp\left(i \frac{2\pi}{\Phi_0} \int_{r_i}^{r_j} \mathbf{A} \cdot d\mathbf{r}\right)
\]
where $\mathbf{A} = B(-y, 0, 0)$ is the vector potential in the Landau gauge, and $\Phi_0 = h/|e|$ is the magnetic flux quantum.

#### Green's function
The Green's function of the system connected to semi - infinite leads at both ends is:
\[
G(\epsilon) = [I\epsilon - H - \Sigma_L(\epsilon) - \Sigma_R(\epsilon)]^{-1}
\]
where $H$ describes the scattering region (including the interferometer itself and part of the leads), $I$ is the unit operator, and $\Sigma_L(\epsilon)$ and $\Sigma_R(\epsilon)$ are the self - energies of the left lead and the right lead at electron energy $\epsilon$ respectively.

#### Density of states
The local density of states (local DOS) is:
\[
\rho_i(\epsilon) = -\frac{1}{\pi} \Im[G_{ii}(\epsilon)]
\]

#### Conductivity
The two - terminal (Hall) conductivity is:
\[
G = \frac{2e^2}{h} \sum_{\beta\alpha} v_\beta v_\alpha |s_{\beta\alpha}|^2
\]
where $t_{\beta\alpha}$ is the transmission coefficient from the incident state $\alpha$ in the left lead to the outgoing state $\beta$ in the right lead, and $s_{\beta\alpha}$...