Abstract:Quantum error mitigation has been proposed as a means to combat unwanted and unavoidable errors in near-term quantum computing without the heavy resource overheads required by fault tolerant schemes. Recently, error mitigation has been successfully applied to reduce noise in near-term applications. In this work, however, we identify strong limitations to the degree to which quantum noise can be effectively `undone' for larger system sizes. Our framework rigorously captures large classes of error mitigation schemes in use today. By relating error mitigation to a statistical inference problem, we show that even at shallow circuit depths comparable to the current experiments, a superpolynomial number of samples is needed in the worst case to estimate the expectation values of noiseless observables, the principal task of error mitigation. Notably, our construction implies that scrambling due to noise can kick in at exponentially smaller depths than previously thought. They also impact other near-term applications, constraining kernel estimation in quantum machine learning, causing an earlier emergence of noise-induced barren plateaus in variational quantum algorithms and ruling out exponential quantum speed-ups in estimating expectation values in the presence of noise or preparing the ground state of a Hamiltonian.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the effectiveness and limitations of Quantum Error Mitigation (QEM) when dealing with larger system sizes. Specifically, the authors identify that the current - generation quantum error mitigation schemes must be reconsidered to achieve their goals, because these schemes may require a large amount of quantum resources in practical applications. Through a rigorous theoretical framework, the paper analyzes that, at a shallow circuit depth, a super - polynomial number of samples are required to estimate the expected value of the noiseless observable. This indicates that it is extremely difficult to effectively "eliminate" quantum noise even at the shallow circuit depth common in current experiments.
### Core problems of the paper
1. **Limitations of quantum error mitigation**:
- The authors point out that for larger system sizes, even at a shallow circuit depth, quantum error mitigation also requires a super - polynomial number of samples to estimate the expected value of the noiseless observable.
- This limitation means that in practical applications, quantum error mitigation may not be able to effectively "eliminate" quantum noise, especially in large - scale quantum computing.
2. **Application of statistical learning theory**:
- The authors transform the quantum error mitigation problem into a statistical inference problem, and by analyzing the statistical characteristics of the noisy quantum state, they reveal the inherent limitations of quantum error mitigation.
- They prove that in the worst - case scenario, even for a noise circuit slightly beyond a constant depth, a super - polynomial number of samples are required for effective error mitigation.
3. **Impact of non - unitary noise**:
- In addition to analyzing local depolarizing noise, the authors also study the impact of non - unitary noise on quantum error mitigation.
- They find that for highly entangled circuits, the mitigation of non - unitary noise also requires an exponential number of samples, which further confirms the limitations of quantum error mitigation.
### Main results
1. **Sample complexity of depolarizing noise**:
- Theorem 1 shows that for an \(n\)-qubit, \(D\)-layer quantum circuit, if affected by local depolarizing noise, the weak error mitigation algorithm requires at least \(s^{-1}p^{-\Omega(nD / s)}\) copies of the noisy output state, where \(s\) and \(p\) are parameters.
- This means that even at a poly - logarithmic depth, error mitigation still requires an exponential number of samples.
2. **Sample complexity of non - unitary noise**:
- Theorem 2 shows that for an \(n\)-qubit, \(D\)-layer noisy quantum circuit, if affected by local non - unitary noise, the weak error mitigation algorithm requires at least \(c^{-\Omega(nD)}\) copies of the noisy output state, where \(c\) is a constant depending on the noise \(N\).
- This indicates that the mitigation of non - unitary noise also requires an exponential number of samples.
### Consequences and impacts
1. **Loss of quantum advantage**:
- The authors point out that at a depth of \(\log\log n\), increasing the number of qubits will lead to a super - polynomial decrease in the distinguishability from the maximally mixed state, which means that the quantum advantage will be rapidly lost at this depth.
2. **Kernel estimation in quantum machine learning**:
- The limitations of quantum error mitigation also affect kernel estimation in quantum machine learning, resulting in early - occurring flat regions (barren plateaus) caused by noise.
3. **Problems in variational quantum algorithms**:
- The noise problem in variational quantum algorithms will lead to the vanishing of the gradient in the optimization process, making it difficult for the algorithm to converge to the optimal solution.
### Outlook
The authors propose a general and rigorous framework that covers a large number of quantum error mitigation schemes currently used on noisy quantum processors and identifies the information - theoretic limitations of these schemes. Although these bounds are still worst - case bounds, they are already closer to practical applications than previous studies. Future work can further narrow this gap, for example, by selecting appropriate local quantum circuits to improve the error mitigation method.