How a Brand's Social Activism Impacts Consumers' Brand Evaluations: The Role of Brand Relationship Norms

Jingjing Li,Nicole Montgomery,Reza Mousavi
2023-09-07
Abstract:With the proliferation of social activism online, brands face heightened pressure from consumers to publicly address these issues. Yet, the optimal brand response strategy (i.e., whether and how to respond) in these contexts remains unclear. This research investigates consumers' reactions to brand response strategies (e.g., engage vs. not) during social activism and offers potentially effective responses that brands can employ to engage in these issues. By analyzing real-world data collected from Twitter and conducting four randomized experiments, this research discovers that brand relationship type (exchange, communal) affects consumers' brand evaluations in the wake of social activism. Communal (vs. exchange) brands are evaluated less favorably when they do not respond or utilize a low-empathy response. This difference is attenuated when brands employ a high-empathy response. These findings are attributable to consumers' perceptions of whether the brand's response strategy complies with relationship norms during social activism. The effects persist across activism events that vary in their political polarization. This research contributes to the literatures on brand engagement in social activism, brand relationships, and crisis communication. The findings also offer guidance to practitioners on crafting response strategies during social activism and aid activists in securing brand support for societal benefits.
General Economics,Applications
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the response strategies of brands in social movements and their impact on consumer evaluations. Specifically, the study aims to address the following key issues: 1. **Optimization of Brand Response Strategies**: With the rise of social movements on social media, consumers expect brands to publicly respond to these social issues. However, it remains unclear how brands should respond (whether to respond and how to respond) to receive positive consumer evaluations. 2. **Exploration of Consumer Reactions**: By analyzing real-world data (from Twitter) and conducting four randomized experiments, the study examines consumer reactions to different brand response strategies (such as participating or not participating in responses) during social movements and proposes potentially effective response strategies. 3. **Impact of Brand Relationship Types**: The study finds that the type of relationship between the brand and consumers (transactional or communal) affects consumer evaluations of the brand after social movements. Communal brands that choose not to respond or adopt low-empathy responses are rated lower by consumers. This difference can be mitigated by adopting high-empathy responses. 4. **Theoretical Contributions and Practical Guidance**: The research contributes to the fields of brand participation in social movements, brand relationship theory, and crisis communication. It provides marketing professionals with guidance on formulating response strategies during social movements and helps social activists gain brand support to achieve social benefits. In short, this study aims to provide a theoretical foundation and practical guidance for how brands can effectively engage in social issues by exploring the response strategies of brands in social movements and their impact on consumer evaluations.