Abstract:Latent dynamical systems have been widely used to characterize the dynamics of neural population activity in the brain. However, these models typically ignore the fact that the brain contains multiple cell types. This limits their ability to capture the functional roles of distinct cell classes, or to accurately predict the effects of cell-specific optogenetic perturbations on neural activity or behavior. To overcome these limitations, we introduce the "cell-type dynamical systems" (CTDS) model. This model extends latent linear dynamical systems to contain distinct latent variables for each cell class, with biologically inspired constraints on both dynamics and emissions. To illustrate our approach, we consider neural recordings with distinct excitatory (E) and inhibitory (I) populations. The CTDS model defines separate latents for E and I cells, and constrains the dynamics so that E (I) latents have a strictly positive (negative) effects on other latents. We applied CTDS to recordings from rat frontal orienting fields (FOF) and anterior dorsal striatum (ADS) during an auditory decision-making task. The model achieved higher accuracy than a standard linear dynamical system (LDS), and revealed that both E and I latents could be used to decode the animal's choice, showing that choice-related information is not restricted to a single cell class. We also performed in-silico optogenetic perturbation experiments in the FOF and ADS, and found that CTDS was able to replicate the causal effects of different perturbations on behavior, whereas a standard LDS model which lacks the ability to capture cell-specific perturbations did not. Crucially, our model allowed us to understand the effects of these perturbations by revealing the dynamics of different cell-specific latents. Finally, CTDS can also be used to identify cell types for neurons whose class labels are unknown in electrophysiological recordings. These results illustrate the power of the CTDS model to provide more accurate and more biologically interpretable descriptions of neural population dynamics and their relationship to behavior.

Disentanglement with Biological Constraints: A Theory of Functional Cell Types

Don't Cut Corners: Exact Conditions for Modularity in Biologically Inspired Representations

Spatial embedding promotes a specific form of modularity with low entropy and heterogeneous spectral dynamics

Biological constraints on neural network models of cognitive function

Basic principles drive self-organization of brain-like connectivity structure

Cognition and the single neuron: How cell types construct the dynamic computations of frontal cortex

Modular representations emerge in neural networks trained to perform context-dependent tasks

Disentangling the Roles of Distinct Cell Classes with Cell-Type Dynamical Systems

The unreasonable effectiveness of small neural ensembles in high-dimensional brain

Modeling somatic computation with non-neural bioelectric networks

Unveiling the intrinsic dynamics of biological and artificial neural networks: from criticality to optimal representations

Form Follows Function: A Different Approach to Neuron Connectivity

Functional connectomics reveals general wiring rule in mouse visual cortex

Neural population geometry: An approach for understanding biological and artificial neural networks

The brain as a probabilistic transducer: an evolutionarily plausible network architecture for knowledge representation, computation, and behavior

Parsimony, exhaustivity and balanced detection in neocortex

Brain-machine convergent evolution: Why finding parallels between brain and artificial systems is informative

Actionable Neural Representations: Grid Cells from Minimal Constraints

Formalising the role of behaviour in neuroscience

The inevitability and superfluousness of cell types in spatial cognition