Development of theoretical frameworks in neuroscience: a pressing need in a sea of data

Horacio G. Rotstein,Fidel Santamaria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.09953
2022-09-21
Abstract:Neuroscience is undergoing dramatic progress because of the vast data streams derived from the new technologies product of the BRAIN initiative and other enterprises. As any other scientific field, neuroscience benefits from having clear definitions of its theoretical components and their interactions. This allows generating theories that integrate knowledge, provide mechanistic insights, and predict results under new experimental conditions. However, theoretical neuroscience is a heterogeneous field that has not yet agreed on how to build theories or whether it is desirable to have an overarching theory or whether theories are simply tools to understand the brain. Here we advocate for the need of developing theoretical frameworks as a basis of generating common theoretical structures. We enumerate the elements of theoretical frameworks we deem necessary for any theory in neuroscience. In particular, we address the notions of paradigms, models, and scales of organizations. We then identify areas with pressing needs to develop brain theories: integration of statistical and dynamic approaches; multi-scale integration; coding; and interpretability in the context of Artificial Intelligence. We also point out that future theoretical frameworks would benefit from the incorporation of the principles of Evolution as a fundamental structure rather than purely mathematical or engineering principles. Rather than providing definite answers, the objective of this paper is to serve as an initial and succinct presentation of these topics to encourage discussion and further in depth development of each topic.
Neurons and Cognition,Populations and Evolution
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the problem of insufficient development of theoretical frameworks in the field of neuroscience. With the new technologies brought about by the BRAIN Initiative and other projects, neuroscience is experiencing rapid data growth. However, these large amounts of data streams need to be integrated through explicit theoretical frameworks to provide mechanistic insights and predict results under new experimental conditions. Currently, theoretical neuroscience is a heterogeneous field, and there is no consensus on how to construct theories or whether a comprehensive theory is needed. Therefore, the authors advocate the development of theoretical frameworks as the basis for generating common theoretical structures, and list the elements of theoretical frameworks that they believe are required for any neuroscience theory, especially the concepts of paradigms, models, and organizational scales. In addition, the authors also point out several areas where there is an urgent need to develop brain theories: the integration of statistical and dynamic methods, multi - scale integration, coding, and interpretability in the context of artificial intelligence. Finally, the authors emphasize that future theoretical frameworks should be based on evolutionary principles rather than relying solely on pure mathematical or engineering principles.