Abstract:In this paper, we clarify a serious misinterpretation and consequent misuse of the Principle of Maximum Conformality (PMC). In a recently published article~\cite{Stevenson:2023isz}, P.~M. Stevenson has claimed that ``the PMC is ineffective and does nothing to resolve the renormalization-scheme-dependence problem", concluding incorrectly that the success of PMC predictions is due to the PMC being a ``laborious, \emph{ad hoc}, back-door" version of the principle of minimum sensitivity (PMS). We show that such conclusions are incorrect, deriving from a misinterpretation of the PMC and overestimation of the applicability of the PMS. The purpose of the PMC is to achieve precise fixed-order pQCD predictions, free from conventional renormalization-scheme and renormalization-scale ambiguities. We demonstrate that the PMC predictions satisfy all of the self-consistency conditions of the renormalization group and standard renormalization-group invariance; the PMC predictions are thus independent of any initial choice of renormalization scheme and scale. The scheme independence of the PMC is also ensured by Commensurate Scale Relations which relate different observables to each other. Owing to the elimination of the factorially-divergent renormalon terms, the PMC series has better convergence behavior than the conventional series; it substantially suppresses any residual scale dependence due to unknown higher-order terms; and it thus provides a reliable basis for estimating the contributions of unknown higher-order terms. Thus, the PMC, based on the standard renormalization group invariance, has a rigorous foundation, eliminates the factorially divergent renormalon contributions, as well as eliminating unnecessary systematic errors which underly high-precision pQCD predictions. The PMC can thus be rigorously applied to virtually all high-energy hadronic processes.

Relation between pole and running masses of heavy quarks using the principle of maximum conformality

Relation between pole and running masses of heavy quarks using the principle of maximum conformality

Ambiguities of the principle of maximum conformality procedure for hadron collider processes

Revisiting the top-quark pair production at future $e^+e^-$ colliders

Precise determination of the top-quark on-shell mass $M_t$ via its scale-invariant perturbative relation to the top-quark $\overline{\rm MS}$ mass ${\overline m}_t({\overline m}_t)$

J^PC=1^++ Heavy Hybrid Masses from QCD Sum-Rules

Scheme-independent determination of the QCD running coupling at all scales from jet observables using the Principle of Maximum Conformality/Infinity

Constraint on the Light Quark Mass M(Q) from Qcd Sum Rules in the I=0 Scalar Channel

QCD corrections of $e^+e^- \to J/ψ+c+\bar{c}$ using the principle of maximum conformality

High precision tests of QCD without scale or scheme ambiguities

The Principle of Maximum Conformality Correctly Resolves the Renormalization-Scheme-Dependence Problem

On the Light Massive Flavor Dependence of the Top Quark Mass

Precise determination of the bottom-quark on-shell mass using its four-loop relation to the $\overline{\rm MS}$-scheme running mass

Precise determination of the bottom-quark on-shell mass using its four-loop relation to the -scheme running mass

Top-quark pole mass extraction at NNLO accuracy, from total, single- and double-differential cross sections for $t\bar{t}+X$ production at the LHC

Neutral pion to two-photons transition form factor revisited

Elimination of QCD Renormalization Scale and Scheme Ambiguities

QCD parameters and $f_{B_c}$ from heavy quark sum rules

Improvement of W Boson Hadronic Decay Width up to $\mathcal{O}\left(α_s^4 \right)$-order