Abstract:Recommender systems are one of the most widely used services on several online platforms to suggest potential items to the end-users. These services often use different machine learning techniques for which fairness is a concerning factor, especially when the downstream services have the ability to cause social ramifications. Thus, focusing on the non-personalised (global) recommendations in news media platforms (e.g., top-k trending topics on Twitter, top-k news on a news platform, etc.), we discuss on two specific fairness concerns together (traditionally studied separately)---user fairness and organisational fairness. While user fairness captures the idea of representing the choices of all the individual users in the case of global recommendations, organisational fairness tries to ensure politically/ideologically balanced recommendation sets. This makes user fairness a user-side requirement and organisational fairness a platform-side requirement. For user fairness, we test with methods from social choice theory, i.e., various voting rules known to better represent user choices in their results. Even in our application of voting rules to the recommendation setup, we observe high user satisfaction scores. Now for organisational fairness, we propose a bias metric which measures the aggregate ideological bias of a recommended set of items (articles). Analysing the results obtained from voting rule-based recommendation, we find that while the well-known voting rules are better from the user side, they show high bias values and clearly not suitable for organisational requirements of the platforms. Thus, there is a need to build an encompassing mechanism by cohesively bridging ideas of user fairness and organisational fairness. In this abstract paper, we intend to frame the elementary ideas along with the clear motivation behind the requirement of such a mechanism.

Who Pays? Personalization, Bossiness and the Cost of Fairness

Fairness Vs. Personalization: Towards Equity in Epistemic Utility

Fairness, Welfare, and Equity in Personalized Pricing

Designing Fair Systems for Consumers to Exploit Personalized Pricing

Fairness and Transparency in Recommendation: The Users' Perspective

Two-Sided Fairness in Non-Personalised Recommendations

Exploring User Opinions of Fairness in Recommender Systems

Fairness Preferences, Actual and Hypothetical: A Study of Crowdworker Incentives

A Personalized Framework for Consumer and Producer Group Fairness Optimization in Recommender Systems

Fairness in recommender systems: research landscape and future directions

Dynamic fairness-aware recommendation through multi-agent social choice

Transparency, Privacy, and Fairness in Recommender Systems

Personalized Counterfactual Fairness in Recommendation

Achieving Fairness via Post-Processing in Web-Scale Recommender Systems

CPFair: Personalized Consumer and Producer Fairness Re-ranking for Recommender Systems

FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided Platforms

Interpolating Item and User Fairness in Multi-Sided Recommendations

The multisided complexity of fairness in recommender systems

Behavior-Based Pricing: An Analysis of the Impact of Peer-Induced Fairness

A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research