Alexander M. Petersen
Abstract:We exploit a city-level panel comprised of individual house price estimates to estimate the impact of COVID-19 on both small and big real-estate markets in California USA. Descriptive analysis of spot house price estimates, including contemporaneous price uncertainty and 30-day price change for individual properties listed on the online real-estate platform <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://Zillow.com" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>, together facilitate quantifying both the excess valuation and valuation confidence attributable to this global socio-economic shock. Our quasi-experimental pre-/post-COVID-19 design spans several years around 2020 and leverages contemporaneous price estimates of rental properties - i.e., real estate entering the habitation market, just not for purchase (off-market) and hence free of speculation - as an appropriate counterfactual to properties listed for sale, which are subject to on-market speculation. Combining unit-level matching and multivariate difference-in-difference regression approaches, we obtain consistent estimates regarding the sign and magnitude of excess price growth observed after the pandemic onset. Specifically, our results indicate that properties listed for sale appreciated an additional 1% per month above what would be expected in the absence of the pandemic. This corresponds to an excess annual price growth of roughly 12.7 percentage points, which accounts for more than half of the actual annual price growth in 2021 observed across the studied regions. Simultaneously, uncertainty in price estimates decreased, signaling the irrational confidence characteristic of prior asset bubbles. We explore how these two trends are related to market size, local market supply and borrowing costs, which altogether lend support for the counterintuitive roles of uncertainty and interruptions in decision-making.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of analyzing collective speculative behavior in the California real estate market during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on housing prices. Specifically, the authors explore how the crisis affected collective speculative behavior in the market by studying changes in housing price estimates during the pandemic and quantifying the magnitude of this impact.
### Main Issues
1. **What are the characteristics of high-frequency real estate price dynamics?** How did these dynamics change before and after the COVID-19 pandemic with a 1-month time resolution?
2. **How did the market uncertainty triggered by the pandemic affect collective speculative behavior?** Especially in terms of housing price estimates and the certainty of these estimates.
3. **How are changes in speculative behavior related to fundamental market factors (such as market size, supply, and benchmark borrowing rates)?**
### Research Background
- **Real Estate Market Response**: Purchasing a home is one of the most significant financial decisions an individual may encounter. Online real estate platforms (such as Zillow.com) facilitate remote comparison and market assessment by aggregating available property information.
- **Market Response in the Early Pandemic**: In the early stages of the pandemic, the response of the US financial and housing markets was negative, but it quickly rebounded in the second half of 2020, particularly in the housing market.
- **Challenges of Data Sources**: Compared to the stock market, high-frequency data in the real estate market is less abundant, limiting the study of market dynamics.
### Methods
- **Data Source**: The authors collected high spatiotemporal resolution property data from Zillow.com for 10 regions in California, spanning from 2018 to 2021.
- **Data Characteristics**: Including each property's address, latitude and longitude, Zillow price estimate (Zestimate), high and low range of price estimates, and price changes within 30 days.
- **Research Design**: Using a difference-in-differences method, the study compares properties listed for sale (affected by market speculation) with rental properties (not affected by short-term market speculation) to estimate the excess part of housing price growth during the pandemic.
### Results
- **Housing Price Growth**: The study found that properties listed for sale experienced an additional 1% monthly growth during the pandemic, equivalent to an additional 12.7 percentage points annually, accounting for more than half of the actual annual growth rate in 2021.
- **Price Uncertainty**: The uncertainty of price estimates decreased, indicating irrational confidence in the market, similar to previous asset bubbles.
- **Market Factors**: Market price growth was related to factors such as market size, supply, and borrowing costs, further supporting the abnormal role of uncertainty in decision-making disruptions.
### Significance
- **Understanding Market Dynamics**: The findings help understand the response of the real estate market to macroeconomic shocks, particularly the collective speculative behavior during the pandemic.
- **Policy Making**: Provides valuable insights into market dynamics and speculative behavior for policymakers, aiding in the formulation of more effective response measures.
Through these analyses, the authors hope to provide new perspectives on understanding the complex dynamics of the real estate market and offer references for future market predictions and policy making.